FAA Delays Sequester-Related Closure of Contract Towers

The tower at Abraham Lincoln Capital Airport in Springfield, Ill., is one of the possible closures. The tower at Abraham Lincoln Capital Airport in Springfield, Ill., is one of the possible closures. Seth Perlman/AP

Facing lawsuits, complaints and planned picket lines from air traffic controllers, the Federal Aviation Administration on Friday announced it is delaying the plan announced in March to close 149 contract airport towers as part of the agency’s $637 million in across-the-board budget cuts under sequestration.

By delaying the closures from April 7 to June 15, the FAA plans to “attempt to resolve the multiple legal challenges to the closure decisions” and continue consulting with airports and operators and review “appropriate risk mitigations,” it said in a press release.

Multiple organizations representing air traffic controllers have denounced the planned closures as a risk to airline safety and a threat to local economies at smaller feeder airports.

“This has been a complex process and we need to get this right,” said Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood. “Safety is our top priority.”

FAA Administrator Michael Huerta said, “We will continue our outreach to the user community to answer any questions and address their concerns about these tower closures.”

About 50 airport authorities and other community members have expressed interest in funding their towers locally by joining the FAA’s non-Federal Contract Tower program, an option FAA can help accomplish, the agency said.

Ron Taylor, president of the Professional Air Traffic Controllers Organization, said the announcement would not influence his group’s plan to set up picket lines April 8 in Trenton, N.J. “This is a good move, but it could be just another delay,” he told Government Executive. “They are still holding controllers hostage in limbo, and we want to see them come to their senses and put the money out.”

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
FROM OUR SPONSORS
JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Close [ x ] More from GovExec
 
 

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

    Download
  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

    Download
  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

    Download
  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

    Download
  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

    Download
  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

    Download
  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security

    Download

When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.