Managers Coalition to Lawmakers: Not All Conferences Are Bad


A coalition of federal managers associations on Wednesday cautioned lawmakers against “extreme restrictions” on conference and travel spending.

In a Feb. 27 letter, the Government Managers Coalition told Reps. Blake Farenthold, R-Texas, and Stephen Lynch, D-Mass., who held a hearing on federal conference and travel spending on Wednesday, that past abuses should not prohibit the legitimate use of events fostering collaboration with other federal employees and outside stakeholders. The GMC consists of five federal executive managers associations, and represents more than 200,000 managers in the federal government.

They argued that legislation proposed in the 112th Congress would have curtailed and restricted federal conference spending excessively, and said such measures  would be detrimental for employees seeking to develop new skills, network and collaborate.

“While this may seem appropriate on its face, blanket reductions do not generally address the problem of mismanagement,” they wrote.

The coalition argued that conferences are necessary to promote “idea-sharing and collaboration on innovative projects,” and argued that many federal employees need to gain specific certifications at conferences in order to do their jobs. Several scientific organizations made a similar case in a letter to the White House last year, saying that restrictions on travel and conferences were hindering exchange of knowledge and inhibiting technical research.

“For example employees from the Federal Aviation Administration and Social Security Administration receive mission critical training and developmental opportunities at their meetings,” the coalition noted in Wednesday’s letter.

The letter follows congressional testimony by Office of Management and Budget Controller Danny Werfel on Wednesday, where he told Farenthold and Lynch's panel  that the Obama administration had curbed travel and conference spending by nearly $2 billion between fiscal 2010 and fiscal 2012. Werfel said in a memo released on Wednesday that across-the-board budget cuts from sequestration on March 1 could mean further reductions for conference and travel budgets.

Still, the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee released a factsheet Wednesday criticizing federal agencies for spending $267.6 million on “big ticket” conferences in fiscal 2012. Members of Congress, including Rep. Jim Jordan R-Ohio, already have started aiming new legislation at what they see as excessive conference and travel spending.  

The managers coalition encouraged congressional leaders to enhance mechanisms to oversee conference spending and prevent waste. They said that watchdogs should evaluate conference and travel spending on a case-by-case basis, and discouraged the use of an across-the-board budget cut to limit it.

“It is our experience that there is never a one–size-fits-all policy and exceptions always exist,” the coalition wrote. “Agencies should have flexibility to determine what travel, meetings and conferences are a necessary expense.”

(Image via Pojoslaw/

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.