Federal judge upholds Obama ban on lobbyists sitting on advisory panels
- By Kedar Pavgi
- September 27, 2012
- Comments
Kuzma/Shutterstock.com
A federal judge has upheld an Obama administration rule banning lobbyists from participating on advisory panels, The Washington Post reported.
The decision defended the Obama administration’s November 2009 ban on lobbyists participating on federal advisory panels, a move designed to curb the influence of these groups on the policymaking process.
The six lobbyists who brought the case were aiming to serve on the Industry Trade Advisory Committees, which advise the Commerce Department and the U.S. Trade representative on policy. They argued they should not be denied a “valuable government benefit” because they had exercised their First Amendment right to petition the government.
But U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson ruled that lobbyists have no legal entitlement to sit on panels. In addition, participation does not constitute a benefit as defined by previous court cases, she said. The lobbyists noted that these positions look good on their resumes and provide good experience.
“Indeed, plaintiffs’ argument that ITAC service is a benefit because it helps them market themselves as real government insiders just proves the point that the government could reasonably believe that excluding lobbyists from ITAC services would increase public confidence that government is not being overtaken by insiders,” Jackson said.
According to the General Services Administration, there are about 1,000 federal advisory panels with more than 60,000 people serving on them. These panels were designed in the 1970s for government administrators to receive technical advice and consulting on federal policy development.
(Image via Kuzma/Shutterstock.com)
By using this service you agree not to post material that is obscene, harassing, defamatory, or otherwise objectionable. Although GovExec.com does not monitor comments posted to this site (and has no obligation to), it reserves the right to delete, edit, or move any material that it deems to be in violation of this rule.
The Vast Majority of IRS Employees Aren't Corrupt
GSA Mishandled Executive Bonuses
EIG 2013 as Told by Your Tweets
Infographic: Nominee Limbo
Will You Be Furloughed?
Boldly Go Where No Fed's Gone Before
Cutting costs: Inside the effort to improve the efficiency of federal operations
Need to Know Memo: Big Data
Mobile Apps: New Ways to Connect Government with Citizens
Sponsored
3 Ways Data is Improving DoD Performance
