Sequestration would cost civilian agencies $39 billion, contractor group says

Raymond Kasprzak/

Nondefense agencies would be hit with $39 billion in top-line budget cuts if the current law’s threat of sequestration kicks in on Jan. 2, 2013, according to new calculations by the Professional Services Council, a contractors trade group.

Though Congress and the White House could still reach a budget deal and head off the 2011 Budget Control Act’s requirement of across-the-board reductions, industry groups have been sounding the alarm about the short- and long-term harm the indiscriminate cuts would impose -- particularly in defense.

In a pivot to the civilian agency side, the council recently analyzed sequestration’s likely impact on 16 nondefense agencies for fiscal 2013. It assumed that Congress will pass a six-month continuing resolution, as expected, and that fiscal 2012 enacted levels form the basis for applying the cuts.

Total civilian agency spending would decline from $551 billion to $512 billion, with the Veterans Affairs Department, under the law, unaffected. The impacts are not uniform because some budget cuts for some agencies are already in the works. The budget cuts would be felt, in descending order, by the Health and Human Services Department ($6.2 billion); Education ($5.3 billion); small agencies and certain programs in intelligence and disaster relief ($4.3 billion); State ($3.4 billion); Homeland Security ($3.1 bilion); Housing and Urban Development ($2.9 billion) Energy ($2.1 billion); Justice ($2.1 billion); Agriculture ($1.7 billion); NASA ($1.4 billion); Transportation ($1.1 billion); Labor ($1 billion); Treasury ($1 billion); Commerce ($0.7 billion); and the Environmental Protection Agency ($0.7 billion).

Council President and Chief Executive Officer Stan Soloway told Government Executive “the current read is that there is very little chance of a change before the election. All agree that sequestration is a terrible idea, but there’s no consensus on what a solution would look like.” The stalemate could change after the election and again after Jan. 2, he added. Soloway added his organization does not involve itself in appropriations debates, but a look at the practical effects of sequestration tells him it will “wreak havoc on agencies and their ability to fulfill their mission.”

An earlier council analysis of the impact of defense cuts of 9.6 percent showed that, because military personnel funds are exempt, the budget categories hit hardest would be procurement and operations and maintenance.

The Obama administration so far has declined to spell out details on sequestration planning, though it must submit such a plan by Sept. 6 under a law passed in August.

In an Aug. 20 report and letter to President Obama, acting Office of Management and Budget Director Jeffrey Zients provided a highly preliminary estimate of one of the new budget law’s provisions. A separate sequester that hits if Congress exceeds a cap on discretionary spending would amount to $6.6 billion in the law’s security category and $0.4 billion in its nonsecurity category.

Correction: A previous version of this story misstated the amounts of the budget cuts as percentages instead of billions. The errors occured in the numbers inside parentheses in the fourth paragraph and have now been corrected. 

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.