Agency financial chiefs lukewarm on campaign against waste

larry1235/Shutterstock.com

Just a year after the White House launched its Campaign to Cut Waste, led by Vice President Joe Biden, federal chief financial officers express some worry that investment in the centralized effort may not pay off because it isn’t aligned with agency missions.

A survey of 300 CFOs and their workforces released Monday by the Association of Government Accountants and Grant Thornton LLP showed that 69 percent of respondents said their agencies had begun looking for ways to curb spending and economize, while 31 percent said they had not. Some 45 percent said they had gotten good results, while 19 had just started implementation.

“Many CFOs view the president’s Campaign to Cut Waste as fairly typical of a new administration,” the survey analysts wrote. “Every president has certain things that he wants to accomplish, and the campaign emphasizes making agencies accountable for the use of taxpayer dollars rather than reducing the deficit. The CFOs are concerned that the requirements of the campaign sometimes divert resources that could have been better deployed elsewhere. Moreover, CFOs contend the campaign did not strategically advance the mission of the agency and so offers little return on investment, but they nonetheless endeavored to implement the campaign in a professional manner.”

Rank-and-file workers surveyed expressed similar views, though they reported less involvement.

The survey highlighted the central role CFOs play during tough budget times, reporting, for example, a high participation rate in setting the agency’s primary goals as called for under the 2010 Government Performance and Results Modernization Act. Some 71 percent of CFOs interviewed and 69 percent responding online said they were involved in goal setting.

But most of the analysis dealt with the impact of budget cuts exacerbated by the weak global economy. “It is a vicious [cycle], as budget cuts drive staff cuts, which impact performance,” the analysis stated. “While every government executive bears some responsibility for the government’s response, CFOs have a leading role because they are functionally responsible for budgeting and performance management. Continuing budget cuts, pay freezes, late appropriations, the specter of sequester, trillion-dollar deficits, and public denigration of civil servants by the media and their elected representatives make the CFO’s job a difficult one.”

Srikant Sastry, managing partner of Grant Thornton’s Global Public Sector, said, “federal agencies may have less funding available to them, but they are getting no relief from the need to provide high-quality services for the American people.”

(Image via larry1235/Shutterstock.com)

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
FROM OUR SPONSORS
JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Close [ x ] More from GovExec
 
 

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

    Download
  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

    Download
  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

    Download
  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

    Download
  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

    Download
  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

    Download
  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security

    Download

When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.