Leaks to Republican ally prompt calls for labor board member to resign

Recent reports by the inspector general for the National Labor Relations Board have stepped up calls for Congress to investigate the legality of a board member’s decision to share internal documents with a former colleague who advised Mitt Romney’s presidential campaign.

Recently appointed NLRB member Terrence Flynn, according to a March inspector general report based on internal emails, released “deliberative, predecisional information” to Romney labor adviser Peter Schaumber, a former NLRB chairman whom Flynn served as counsel, and another former board member, Peter Kirsanow.

The disclosures took place in 2010 and 2011, before Flynn joined the board but while he was serving as NLRB counsel to another board member. The email exchanges between Flynn and former colleagues in 2010 and 2011 discussed the processing of cases, including a draft of a board majority decision and four dissents that had not been issued.

On May 2, NLRB Inspector General David Berry issued a supplemental report providing additional emails on the document disclosure after noting Flynn “made certain public statements that caused us concern and we determined it was necessary to continue our investigative efforts.”

The IG said Flynn violated the standards of conduct for the executive branch and “lacked candor” during the probe. His disclosures threatened the board’s due process and the IG found “that Mr. Flynn violated federal regulations.” Berry asked NLRB to review the facts and sent his report to the Office of Special Counsel to determine whether there were Hatch Act violations.

Flynn, whom President Obama named as a recess appointment in January and who spent the previous seven years on the NLRB staff, has maintained that that his actions constitute “legitimate outreach,” and, when interviewed by the IG, “implied that he has inherent authority to release deliberative information.”

Flynn’s attorney on May 2 wrote to the IG saying there was no evidence that board deliberations were compromised and the emails were simply a dialogue between former colleagues.

“We strenuously object to the `renewed’ investigation of Mr. Flynn and to the purported findings set forth in the supplemental report,” the attorney wrote. “Indeed, the entire course and conduct of this investigation, much of which is unprecedented, raises serious questions as to its objectivity, impartiality, independence and intended purpose. Mr. Flynn is a dedicated public servant with an outstanding record of performance at the National Labor Relations Board . . He has cooperated voluntarily with both of your interviews.”

The IG suggested that Flynn’s motive in releasing the documents was to help his own long-term prospects for appointment to the board.

“Giving information to any individual outside the board that would be withheld from a congressional oversight process is not appropriate,” Berry wrote. “We are not aware of any legitimate federal purpose that is served by giving former member Schaumber advance notice of how a case is going to be decided, when a vote is going to take place, or the priorities of the board.”

NLRB Chairman Mark Gaston Pearce said in a statement, “We take the findings in these reports very seriously. They raise questions of ethics and trust that go to the heart of the values shared by all of us at the NLRB. Those concerns are paramount in our minds as we consider the necessary response.”

Rep. George Miller, D-Calif., ranking member on the House Education and the Workforce Committee, has asked the Justice Department to look at the case and sent Flynn a letter Wednesday asking him to resign, as did Sen. Tom Harkin, D-Iowa.“Disclosing judges’ deliberations in pending cases to outside parties . . . is repugnant to the American justice system. Such behavior cannot be allowed to continue,” Miller wrote.

“The board is the only agency where workers and employers may go to have their rights under the National Labor Relations Act vindicated,” he said. “The public’s faith in this agency and its fair administration of the law matters. Your continued presence at the board rattles that faith and potentially infringes upon the due process rights of those with business before the board.”

Rep. Elijah Cummings, D-Md., ranking member on the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, called for Republicans who run his committee to open an investigation. The IG’s reports raise “serious concerns,” he said in a statement. But “even more troubling is that House Republicans refuse to investigate these leaks, bury their heads in the sand and continue to ignore documented wrongdoing by Republican NLRB officials. This is not the even-handed and rigorous congressional oversight the American people expect and deserve.”

Jon Ross, an attorney who retired from NLRB last fall, said Flynn should have known better. “I'm very surprised by this whole episode, because Terry is a smart guy - smart enough, I would have thought, to have known better than either (1) to do what the IG's reports say he did or (2) to have used his office email to do it,” he said.

The Romney campaign did not respond to queries, but The Wall Street Journal on Thursday reported that Schaumber ended his role with the campaign in December 2011.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.