Friction between union, managers at Social Security goes public

Office of Personnel Management Director John Berry responded Tuesday to a complaint about a lack of managers at labor-management meetings at the Social Security Administration.

Since President Obama extended an executive order encouraging labor-management forums at agencies, SSA employee Patricia Spade said, the group at her department consists only of “high-level executives and unions” who consider participation by managers a “deal breaker.”

Addressing Berry at the national conference of the Federal Managers Association -- which also has been calling for greater participation by management associations in the meetings -- Spade said many proposals that arise in the forum “need tweaking” by management and the American Federation of Government Employees is “calling the shots and dissing” the other unions, leaving her “embarrassed.”

SSA for more than two years has struggled for consensus on labor-management issues.

Besides AFGE, the largest union in the agency, SSA employees also are represented by the International Federation of Professional and Technical Engineers, the National Treasury Employees Union, and the National Federation of Federal Employees.

Berry said, “one group shouldn’t dominate, and there should be a spirit of partnership that says, Let’s work together pre-decisionally, sitting down so that the manager corps can adapt.” He acknowledged “some jealousies and friction points on which managers should be at the table” but said managers are not ceding supervisory authority and the trouble spots are “not spread widely.”

“At OPM, managers are at the table with AFGE locals, which may be a model for other agencies,” Berry said. At SSA, “neither side is blameless. There is a tendency to let the past constrain the future,” he said. “But we don’t want to be like Northern Ireland and talk forever with the same dug-in on old positions and old thinking.”

Involvement of managers is essential, Berry said, adding there are not enough senior executives for the 2,000 labor-management forum sites around the country.

He told reporters afterward that he has worked on the problem with SSA Commissioner Michael Astrue as well as George Cohen, director of the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service. Berry called for “more trust, dialogue and respectful conversations.” But he told the audience member he would take Spade’s complaint under consideration.

Asked by Government Executive for a reaction, AFGE National President John Gage, said in an email, “It is unfortunate that erroneous rumors and uninformed opinions are being spread about the labor-management process between AFGE and SSA. It is ridiculous to say that AFGE is keeping managers from being on the [labor-management forums]. Management chooses its members, and the union chooses its members. AFGE does not have the ability to dictate to SSA who gets to be at the table.”

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.