Senator accuses FDA nominee of withholding information

Senate Finance Chairman Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, is accusing acting Food and Drug Administration Commissioner Andrew von Eschenbach of failing to defer to congressional oversight, further complicating his bid to head the agency.

This latest confrontation was prompted by von Eschenbach's written responses to questions submitted by Grassley during a Senate confirmation hearing. Grassley released those responses Thursday along with a critical statement: "The actions and words of this nominee display a misunderstanding of congressional oversight of the executive branch of government."

Specifically, Grassley accused von Eschenbach of failing to cooperate with the committee's investigation of the antibiotic Ketek. The investigation was sparked by allegations that the drug was approved by the FDA despite evidence that some clinical safety data was fraudulent.

In his response to a question about the agency's failure to cooperate with the investigation, von Eschenbach wrote that "disclosure of pre-decisional information would significantly compromise the ability of our staff to consider important public health and safety matters in an objective and independent setting."

Grassley also released a letter sent Wednesday to Health and Human Services Secretary Michael Leavitt, accusing the FDA and HHS of failing to provide all information requested by the committee.

"Selectively providing documents and access to executive agency officials pursuant to a Congressional subpoena cannot constitute compliance," Grassley wrote, noting that some relevant documents had been "'overlooked' or purposefully withheld."

Grassley requested a complete list of officials involved in the review or post-market surveillance of Ketek by Dec. 13. In an e-mailed statement, an FDA spokeswoman said, "We have worked diligently w/ Sen. Grassley's staff since April to provide them access to as much data and as many Agency personnel as possible, while remaining responsible stewards of the extraordinarily sensitive information we handle, as a regulatory agency in the Executive Branch."

Grassley announced his intention to block a Senate vote on von Eschenbach's nomination in a Nov. 16 letter to Majority Leader Bill Frist, R-Tenn., because of his "continued failure to comply with the Committee's subpoenas over the past six months."

A spokeswoman for Finance ranking member Max Baucus, D-Mont., who will become chairman in January, declined to comment on Grassley's criticisms of the nominee. Von Eschenbach, who was nominated to the position in March, faces additional hurdles to his confirmation.

Sens. David Vitter, R-La., and Jim DeMint, R-S.C., also have expressed their intentions to put a hold on the nomination. Vitter wants the FDA to legalize the importation of personal shipments of prescription drugs from Canada. DeMint said he objects to the sale of RU-486.

Sens. Hillary Rodham Clinton, D-N.Y., and Patty Murray, D-Wash., lifted their early objections to von Eschenbach's confirmation in late August after the FDA agreed to allow over-the-counter sale of Plan B to women age 18 or older. The Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee approved Von Eschenbach's nomination by voice vote in September.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.