OPM investigator launches probe of Office of Special Counsel chief

The Office of Personnel Management's inspector general has begun an investigation into charges that the head of the small, independent agency responsible for protecting federal employees against prohibited personnel practices, including retaliation, improperly retaliated against his own employees.

The investigation of Scott Bloch, head of the Office of Special Counsel, stems from a complaint filed in early March with the President's Council on Integrity and Efficiency by a group of anonymous OSC career employees. A coalition of nonprofit Washington-based whistleblower protection groups--Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility, the Government Accountability Project and the Project on Government Oversight--joined in the complaint.

The OSC employees and nonprofit groups claim that Bloch retaliated against employees who complained about office policies, issued an illegal gag order, abused his hiring authority, discriminated against homosexuals, allowed political bias to influence enforcement of the Hatch Act and forced senior career staff to relocate from OSC's Washington headquarters to a new regional office in Detroit.

Bloch has flatly denied the charges. OSC declined to comment on the OPM IG's investigation.

Clay Johnson, deputy director for management at the Office of Management and Budget and chair of the PCIE, an umbrella group of inspectors general and representatives of other government oversight agencies, assigned OPM Inspector General Patrick McFarland to conduct the investigation of Bloch.

McFarland has served as OPM's IG since August 1990 and is chairman of the PCIE's investigations committee. He was a member of the Secret Service for 22 years and worked as a St. Louis police officer and a Federal Bureau of Narcotics special agent in Chicago, according to his official biography.

In an Oct. 17 letter obtained by Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility, Patricia Marshall, the IG's special counsel, said that McFarland would be handling the investigation and asked Washington attorney Debra Katz, who is representing both the unnamed OSC employees and the whistleblower protection groups, for documents related to the complaint.

"OSC's credibility has been destroyed," Katz wrote in a June 22 letter to Johnson inquiring why the investigation had not moved forward. "[C]areer staff are fleeing in unprecedented numbers, convinced that nothing will be done to address Mr. Bloch's violations of law and abuses of authority."

But in response to this allegation, OSC said it has a higher number of career employees than it has had at any time in the past three years.

Katz also alleged in the letter that Bloch lied in May testimony before the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Subcommittee on Oversight of Government Management. OSC said in a statement that this charge is false.

The long delay between the filing of the complaint and the assignment of McFarland to the investigation "reinforces the notion that the President's Council on Integrity and Efficiency actually undercuts its avowed mission of effective oversight," said Jeff Ruch, PEER's executive director.

PEER has little experience working with McFarland, Ruch said. The IG's response to questions posed by Katz "will determine whether it will be a worthwhile investigation or not," he added.

In correspondence with McFarland, Katz questioned why the scope of the investigation would only cover allegations filed on March 3, 2005, and would leave out amendments filed later.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.