VA reveals plan for restructuring veterans health care system

A draft proposal from the Veterans Affairs Department for overhauling the veterans health care system that includes closing seven medical facilities is drawing mixed reactions from veterans advocacy groups.

The draft Capital Asset Realignment for Enhanced Services (CARES) proposal, released Monday by the department, is a 20-year realignment plan for the aging health care infrastructure system that serves 4.5 million patients at a cost of about $25 billion a year.

Under the proposal, hospitals in Canandaigua, N.Y.; Pittsburgh; Lexington, Ky.; Brecksville, Ohio; Gulfport, Miss.; Livermore, Calif.; and Waco, Texas would close. A 15-member commission will review the proposal and send a recommendation to VA Secretary Anthony Principi at the end of the year. Principi will issue a final decision in early 2004.

Dr. Robert Roswell, undersecretary for health at VA, briefed CARES commission members Thursday on the draft proposal, which also includes opening new hospitals in Las Vegas and Orlando, Fla., as well as adding new spinal cord injury centers in Denver; Minneapolis; Syracuse or Albany, N.Y.; and Little Rock, Ark., and centers for the blind in Biloxi, Miss., and Long Beach, Calif. According to Roswell, the average veterans health care facility is more than 50 years old and the growing number of vacancies in some facilities has drawn criticism from the General Accounting Office. Under the CARES plan, services would be shifted to areas with a higher concentration of veterans.

"We looked at existing facilities, we looked at the existing veteran population and we tried to forecast what the veteran population would need in terms of health care," Roswell said Thursday. "The plan expands veterans health care services."

But some veterans groups are wary of the proposal, which is estimated to cost $4.6 billion over the next 20 years.

"We realize there are some facilities that probably need to be closed down, but the VA needs to build new facilities in their place before they close them down," said Ronald Conley, national commander of the American Legion, which has 3 million members. "Congress is going to have to appropriate the necessary money to build these VA hospitals."

Conley is also concerned that the CARES proposal does not take into consideration current active duty military personnel, who may need veterans health care facility services after the war on terrorism.

"That increase has to be taken into consideration," Conley said. "How is the VA going to handle that patient load?"

While drafting the proposal, VA officials met with veterans groups and other stakeholders in the communities affected by the proposed closings and next week, the commission will begin holding a series of hearings across the country to get feedback on the proposal before sending a recommendation to Principi.

"We've seen examples of local involvement that have made a difference, and we certainly hope that the whole process does listen to the local community to make sure that whatever decisions are made truly do meet the community need there and the veterans in the communities," said David Autry, deputy national director of communications for Disabled American Veterans, a nonprofit organization with more than 1 million members. "There is always some concern that this may be a top-down kind of thing and I certainly think that is a wrong approach."

Autry said some veterans are concerned that VA officials will just close facilities so that "bean counters' numbers add up," rather than taking an expansive look at what services are needed in various communities.

"We want to make sure that whatever realignment and efficiencies the VA comes up with [do] enhance services," Autry said. "Some of these facilities are the major source of income for the local economy and it's a big deal. It needs to be handled properly and we're certainly willing and able to work with the VA."

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.