Lawmakers debate employee role in ‘fast-track’ reorganization

Lawmakers Thursday vowed to include the input of federal employees and other key stakeholders in the plan to grant the president "fast-track" authority to reorganize federal agencies.

House Government Reform Committee Chairman Tom Davis, R-Va., is pushing to reinstate the president's power to propose major organizational changes to federal agencies while allowing Congress to disapprove or approve the action without lengthy debate. A provision in the 1932 Economy Act granted executive branch officials such fast-track authority, and Congress routinely reauthorized the provision until 1984, when President Reagan let it lapse.

Davis pledged that any reauthorization legislation would include provisions to ensure that federal employee unions are included in the decision-making process. "We will put safeguards in this legislation," he said. "We want everybody to be comfortable with the language."

Nancy Dorn, deputy director for the Office of Management and Budget, said such safeguards are not necessary because fast-track authority is a procedure that "doesn't get [the president] anything in and of itself." Congress, she said, still must approve any changes the president seeks to implement.

Without fast-track authority, presidents will lack the "ability to bring sense to the chaos that is the federal government," Dorn said. Authority to expedite agencies' reorganization efforts is a central component of the president's management agenda, a five-part plan to streamline government operations, she said.

The movement to reinstate fast-track authority is gaining momentum. Davis said he believes such authority would limit political turf fights over major reorganizations necessary to improve government efficiency and bring agencies into the information age. The National Commission on the Public Service, a 10-member bipartisan group of former federal officials, also endorsed fast-track authority in a Jan. 7 report.

Colleen Kelley, president of the National Treasury Employees Union, said the input of employees and other government stakeholders is key to the policy-making process. "It is the legislative process, particularly congressional hearings, which provide agency managers, employees and individuals and businesses who deal with federal agencies, with the meaningful opportunity to comment on the structure and function of their government."

Kelley noted that if President Bush had been allowed to place legislation establishing the Homeland Security Department on a fast track, the final law would not have included the whistleblower protections for workers in the new department-a provision lawmakers added after long debate. A "fast track" scenario eliminates "all meaningful dialogue and review by Congress," she said.

Comptroller General David Walker said he believes Davis can draft fast-track legislation that satisfies the executive branch, lawmakers and unions. The legislation must be detailed and should ensure adequate discussion, especially over "substantive" reorganizations that involve eliminating federal programs or altering workers' rights, Walker said. Separate laws might be necessary for substantive reorganizations versus those that simply involve physically housing agencies under different roofs, he said.

Davis said he hoped all the stakeholders could agree that "certain operational restructurings that have a minimal impact on federal policy may best be initiated and developed by the 'experts' in the executive branch rather than by the generalists within Congress."

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.