Senate panel votes to let Postal Service keep retirement plan surplus

Senators found a way Wednesday to stave off postal rate hikes by using a $78 billion surplus in the Postal Service retirement plan to plug holes in the service's budget.

The Senate Governmental Affairs Committee approved by voice vote legislation (S. 380) that the bill's sponsors say will prevent postal rate hikes until at least 2006.

Chairwoman Susan Collins, R-Maine, said the Office of Personnel Management had discovered that higher-than-expected yields on investments meant the Postal Service was paying more into the retirement account than necessary. As a result, she said, unless adjusted, the overfunding will be $78 billion more than needed to pay retirement benefits over the next 60 years.

By making formula changes to reduce what the Postal Service pays into the Civil Service Retirement Fund, she said, the service can use savings to reduce its debt to the Treasury by about $3 billion this year and postal rate hikes can be avoided for three years.

The bill will not affect postal workers' pensions and has the backing of government agencies, the Postal Service and postal unions. The bill "makes a lot of sense," Sen. Ted Stevens, R-Alaska, said.

The bipartisan bill was a substitute offered by Collins. It is essentially the same as the original measure except to require reports to Congress by the Postal Service at least eight months before proposed rate hikes.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.