Former Los Alamos officials deny accusations of mismanagement

Former managers at Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico told lawmakers Wednesday that they fired two investigators in November because of poor work performance, not because they blew the whistle on widespread fraud and theft at the lab.

The ex-managers who testified voluntarily before the House Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations denied accusations that they failed to report the misuse of government purchase cards and the theft of lab equipment to the proper law enforcement authorities and obstructed investigations.

Former Deputy Director Joseph Salgado, and Stan Busboom, head of the Los Alamos security division, were reassigned from management positions during a January shakeup of high-level staff at the lab. Frank Dickson Jr., Los Alamos' general counsel, also testified at the hearing Thursday.

All three said that they did not fire Glenn Walp and Steven Doran, two investigators under their supervision, because they thought the two leaked reports of mismanagement to the media, jeopardizing the University of California's roughly $1.7 billion-a-year contract to run the nuclear weapons facility for the Department of Energy. Instead, they claimed that they fired the investigators because the two had provided inaccurate and unreliable information in some reports, and had not served as good liaisons to FBI agents working on Los Alamos cases.

When pressed for details, they said that Walp and Doran had gotten the facts wrong when looking into allegations that a lab employee had used a government purchase card to buy a $30,000 Mustang. For example, the two investigators gave superiors the wrong address of the car's recipients, Salgado testified. Such misinformation made it difficult for officials and outside investigators to trust Walp and Doran, he said.

But after further questioning, the three acknowledged that Walp and Doran had only had four days to work on the Mustang case before turning it over to the FBI. They also conceded that an FBI agent had told them Walp and Doran were doing an excellent job and were some of the best liaisons he had encountered.

In addition, Busboom acknowledged that he had given both investigators high performance ratings in an October performance review. He said that the evaluation only covered work completed through July and that the quality of the investigators' work declined drastically in the late summer and fall.

A report released by the Energy Department's inspector general in late January countered Thursday's testimony, substantiating Walp and Doran's claims. The report concluded that lab officials had created "an atmosphere where Los Alamos employees were discouraged from, or had reason to believe that they were discouraged from, raising concerns about property loss and theft, or other concerns, to appropriate authorities."

In the report (DOE/IG-0584), the inspector general included a tally of suspected stolen goods topping $1.5 million. The list included 204 desktop computers with a purchase value of $694,938; 12 cameras worth $11,318; and 27 radio transceivers worth $35,000. The FBI and investigators at Energy's Office of Inspector General are trying to find the purportedly stolen items.

The lab rehired Walp and Doran after the IG's office released its report. The two now work as consultants for the University of California's Office of the President. The two would like to see all of the managers who allegedly covered up fraud and theft at Los Alamos fired, rather than simply demoted, they told lawmakers at a hearing two weeks ago. Until these managers are gone and a new leadership team is fully in place, the lab will be vulnerable to more problems, they said.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Going Agile:Revolutionizing Federal Digital Services Delivery

    Here’s one indication that times have changed: Harriet Tubman is going to be the next face of the twenty dollar bill. Another sign of change? The way in which the federal government arrived at that decision.

  • Cyber Risk Report: Cybercrime Trends from 2016

    In our first half 2016 cyber trends report, SurfWatch Labs threat intelligence analysts noted one key theme – the interconnected nature of cybercrime – and the second half of the year saw organizations continuing to struggle with that reality. The number of potential cyber threats, the pool of already compromised information, and the ease of finding increasingly sophisticated cybercriminal tools continued to snowball throughout the year.

  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

  • GBC Issue Brief: The Future of 9-1-1

    A Look Into the Next Generation of Emergency Services

  • GBC Survey Report: Securing the Perimeters

    A candid survey on cybersecurity in state and local governments

  • The New IP: Moving Government Agencies Toward the Network of The Future

    Federal IT managers are looking to modernize legacy network infrastructures that are taxed by growing demands from mobile devices, video, vast amounts of data, and more. This issue brief discusses the federal government network landscape, as well as market, financial force drivers for network modernization.

  • eBook: State & Local Cybersecurity

    CenturyLink is committed to helping state and local governments meet their cybersecurity challenges. Towards that end, CenturyLink commissioned a study from the Government Business Council that looked at the perceptions, attitudes and experiences of state and local leaders around the cybersecurity issue. The results were surprising in a number of ways. Learn more about their findings and the ways in which state and local governments can combat cybersecurity threats with this eBook.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.