Fix for Postal retirement payments gaining ground

Legislation that would effectively allow the Postal Service to hold rates steady until 2006 is likely to reach the House floor next week, according to congressional staff.

The bill, H.R. 735, aims to alter how much money the agency pays into the Civil Service Retirement System. Last November, the Office of Personnel Management found that under the current system, the Postal Service would pay about $71 billion-the number has since been modified to $78 billion-more than it needed to cover the future costs of CSRS enrollees' pensions. OPM conducted the review at the request of the General Accounting Office, which has been trying to get a better handle on the Postal Service's retirement and health care liabilities.

The House bill, along with similar legislation in the Senate, S. 380, would lower the Postal Service's payments to the fund, but would have no impact on payouts to retirees. If enacted, the legislation would reduce the Postal Service's liability by $2.9 billion this year alone. That would enable the agency to pay down its debt to the Treasury, now totaling $11 billion, and hold mailing rates steady for three years. Without the change, the agency would have to increase rates next year.

Both bills have broad bipartisan support. The only possible sticking point is an amendment being contemplated by Rep. Henry Waxman, D-Calif. Under current law, costs for a retiree's military service is covered by the Treasury Department, not the Postal Service. The legislation would require the Postal Service to pick up the tab. Waxman opposes such an approach and his amendment, which is still be drafted, would somehow prevent the Postal Service from paying the military portion of a retiree's pension.

OPM officials have told congressional aides that they would recommend a veto if the bill is modified. Rep. Tom Davis, R-Va., chairman of the House Government Reform Committee and co-sponsor of the House bill, agrees with Waxman, but congressional aides say he is not willing to have a showdown with the White House on this issue.

"To kill this bill would be like voting for a rate increase," said one congressional staffer. During a markup of the bill last month, Davis suggested that the issue of military service could be handled in future legislation.

In other postal news, members of the House Appropriations Transportation, Treasury and Independent Agencies Subcommittee Thursday were supportive of the agency's request for additional security funding. The agency is seeking $350 million to continue upgrading facilities to combat acts of terrorism, such as the anthrax attacks in October 2001. While the committee did not vote on the proposal, members on both sides of aisle said the taxpayer, not the ratepayer, should pay for homeland security improvements. Since Sept. 11, 2001, Congress has appropriated $800 million to the Postal Service for security purposes.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by Brocade

    Best of 2016 Federal Forum eBook

    Earlier this summer, Federal and tech industry leaders convened to talk security, machine learning, network modernization, DevOps, and much more at the 2016 Federal Forum. This eBook includes a useful summary highlighting the best content shared at the 2016 Federal Forum to help agencies modernize their network infrastructure.

  • Sponsored by CDW-G

    GBC Flash Poll Series: Merger & Acquisitions

    Download this GBC Flash Poll to learn more about federal perspectives on the impact of industry consolidation.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    A DevOps Roadmap for the Federal Government

    This GBC Report discusses how DevOps is steadily gaining traction among some of government's leading IT developers and agencies.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.

  • Sponsored by CDW-G

    Joint Enterprise Licensing Agreements

    Read this eBook to learn how defense agencies can achieve savings and efficiencies with an Enterprise Software Agreement.

  • Sponsored by Cloudera

    Government Forum Content Library

    Get all the essential resources needed for effective technology strategies in the federal landscape.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.