'Open records' advocates criticize administration's strategy

Bush administration attempts to limit the posting of "sensitive" information about homeland security to agency Web sites is undermining the Freedom of Information Act, open-records advocates charged this week.

Orders issued by White House Chief of Staff Andrew Card and Attorney General John Ashcroft instructed agencies to deny public access to many government documents that in the past either have been readily available or subject to FOIA requests.

Sean Moulton, senior policy analyst at OMB Watch, said "the Bush administration's predisposition for secrecy" existed well before the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. But because individual agencies decide what to keep online, he said some agencies-including the Federal Aviation Administration-since have removed information without following set procedures.

The administration's orders have helped heighten the significance of FOIA, which in 1974 created the presumption that all government records be accessible to the public unless specifically exempted. The powerful law gives advocacy groups, journalists and the public strong legal grounds to sue when agencies reject their requests for information.

"We have always been very committed to personal privacy and open government," David Sobel, general counsel at the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC), said in seeking to explain the privacy group's interest in open records.

"The government should have a limited ability to collect information about citizens, but citizens should have a very strong ability to collect information about the government."

Next week EPIC is set to release Litigation Under the Federal Open Government Laws, a new edition of a casebook on FOIA law co-edited by Sobel. The American Civil Liberties Union published the book until 1997, but it has been out of print for several years.

"Since 9/11, there has been an attempt to radically shift the information flows," Sobel continued. "The government is increasingly about knowing more and more information [about individuals], and restricting the ability for individuals to know what the government is doing."

Speaking at a Wednesday conference of the American Society of Access Professionals, a group of public-records professionals, Moulton said that under FOIA exemptions, the government has no obligation to release "classified" information. But he expressed concern about a March memo by Card urging agencies to deny public access to "sensitive but unclassified information."

The "sensitive" standard is not defined by FOIA and hence is subject to widely varying interpretations. Such information includes large groups of chemical information that OMB Watch and other groups monitor to ensure compliance with environmental laws.

"A more precise and definitive approach" is necessary, Moulton said.

But he praised a recent 6th Circuit Court of Appeals Ruling holding that deportation hearings could not be held in secret. Quoting from the opinion, he said, "'Democracies die behind closed door,' and 'selective information is misinformation.'"

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.