Agencies lower executives’ ratings, limit bonuses

Some federal agencies are getting tougher on senior executives, issuing lower performance ratings and giving out fewer bonuses, according to a new report. More agencies may start following suit.

From 2000 to 2001, the Internal Revenue Service, the Veterans Benefits Administration and the Federal Highway Administration reduced the percentage of bonuses they handed out to executives, the General Accounting Office said in a report issued Friday. The IRS and the VBA also issued far fewer top performance ratings to executives than most agencies did in 2001.

"Effective performance management systems provide agencies with the objective and fact-based information they need to distinguish levels of performance among senior executives and serve as a basis for bonus recommendations," GAO said in the report, "Using Balanced Expectations to Manage Senior Executive Performance" (02-966).

Across government, 82 percent of federal executives received the highest possible ratings on their performance evaluations and 52 percent received bonuses in 2001, the General Accounting Office said. Critics argue such figures show that most agencies aren't using ratings and bonuses to motivate executives to improve performance.

The Office of Personnel Management in 2000 ordered agencies to better link executive evaluations with organizational goals and use performance evaluations to make decisions about pay and bonuses. GAO studied four agencies that are ahead of the pack in following through on OPM's order.

The report suggests executives can take a financial hit when their agencies change their evaluation programs.

At the Veterans Benefits Administration, 82 percent of senior managers were recommended for bonuses or promotions in 2000, even though the agency didn't hit its goals and some offices performed better than others. The agency set up detailed performance agreements for senior executives for 2001. As a result, only 50 percent of senior executives received bonuses in 2001.

Only 31 percent of executives at the Internal Revenue Service received an outstanding rating in 2001, compared to 42 percent for 2000. The decline in executives receiving bonuses was less drastic, from 56 percent to 52 percent.

At the Federal Highway Administration, the number of executives who got bonuses went down from 49 percent in 2000 to 44 percent in 2001.

The percentage of executives who got bonuses at the Bureau of Land Management stayed roughly the same, at 47 percent. Unlike the other agencies included in the study, BLM uses a pass-fail system to evaluate executives.

GAO found that the agencies it studied are using several tactics that other agencies could adopt to improve their executive evaluation systems.

  • They provide useful data to their executives so that executives can track their individual progress against agency goals.
  • They require that their executives develop follow-up plans to improve on areas that need improvement.
  • They make meaningful distinctions among executives instead of giving every executive the highest rating or spreading bonuses evenly.
In addition, the four agencies have developed evaluation systems that rate executives on basic business results, customer satisfaction and employee opinions of their performance. That so-called "balanced scorecard" or "balanced expectations" approach has been widely adopted in the private sector to evaluate organizations' and executives' performance.

Other agencies have started implementing similar evaluation systems.

"More progress is needed in explicitly linking senior executive expectations for performance to results-oriented organizational goals, fostering the necessary collaboration both within and across organizational boundaries to achieve results and demonstrating a commitment to lead and facilitate change," the GAO report said.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Going Agile:Revolutionizing Federal Digital Services Delivery

    Here’s one indication that times have changed: Harriet Tubman is going to be the next face of the twenty dollar bill. Another sign of change? The way in which the federal government arrived at that decision.

  • Cyber Risk Report: Cybercrime Trends from 2016

    In our first half 2016 cyber trends report, SurfWatch Labs threat intelligence analysts noted one key theme – the interconnected nature of cybercrime – and the second half of the year saw organizations continuing to struggle with that reality. The number of potential cyber threats, the pool of already compromised information, and the ease of finding increasingly sophisticated cybercriminal tools continued to snowball throughout the year.

  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

  • GBC Issue Brief: The Future of 9-1-1

    A Look Into the Next Generation of Emergency Services

  • GBC Survey Report: Securing the Perimeters

    A candid survey on cybersecurity in state and local governments

  • The New IP: Moving Government Agencies Toward the Network of The Future

    Federal IT managers are looking to modernize legacy network infrastructures that are taxed by growing demands from mobile devices, video, vast amounts of data, and more. This issue brief discusses the federal government network landscape, as well as market, financial force drivers for network modernization.

  • eBook: State & Local Cybersecurity

    CenturyLink is committed to helping state and local governments meet their cybersecurity challenges. Towards that end, CenturyLink commissioned a study from the Government Business Council that looked at the perceptions, attitudes and experiences of state and local leaders around the cybersecurity issue. The results were surprising in a number of ways. Learn more about their findings and the ways in which state and local governments can combat cybersecurity threats with this eBook.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.