New tool for rating federal programs almost ready, OMB says

A White House budgeting tool that could influence funding decisions for one-fifth of all federal programs is almost complete, a top Office of Management and Budget official said Tuesday.

OMB is set to unveil a preliminary version of its new method for rating the effectiveness of federal programs, said Marcus Peacock, OMB's associate program director for natural resources, at a conference sponsored by the National Academy of Public Administration in College Park, Md. The method, which OMB calls the Program Assessment Rating Tool, will be used on 20 percent of federal programs in the fiscal 2004 budget cycle.

OMB Director Mitch Daniels has said that programs that are deemed ineffective in the rating process could lose funding or face elimination.

The tool is a series of questions that budget examiners will ask to determine whether programs are working or not. Crafted by a 10-person "strike force" drawn from various OMB offices, the tool requires examiners to judge how programs achieve their goals, whether they are geared toward meaningful performance goals, and whether they are necessary in the first place. OMB customized the questions to fit seven different types of federal programs, including programs administered through regulation; competitive grants; block grants; loans; direct federal programs; research and development programs; and capital asset programs.

The President's Management Council, which is made of deputy secretaries from each Cabinet department, plans to discuss the new method Wednesday. OMB also hopes to get feedback on the tool from academics and members of the public, according to Peacock. Tweaking the rating tool will also be the first task of a new OMB Performance Measurement Advisory Council, which will hold its first meeting June 27.

"After June, we can use them [the council] to ask all sorts of questions about where we should head in the future and how this [rating] process can be refined," said Peacock.

Examiners will still have to consider factors besides the program ratings as they assemble the budget, but the ratings should inform funding decisions, he said. Eventually, the ratings should prompt agencies engaged in similar activities-such as wetlands protection or health care-to compete with one another to provide the best service to the public.

"Imagine a competition between federal managers trying to protect the most acres of wetlands for every dollar expended, or educate the most kids," he said. "That I consider a very powerful tool."

Peacock is also planning to brief members of Congress on the rating system. Traditionally, appropriators have shown little interest in using performance reviews to guide funding decisions, but Peacock believes this will change with the administration's fiscal 2004 budget submission. "Once they see that the information will be used to make decisions in the president's budget, that will get their attention," he said.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.