OMB program reviews could lead to cuts

Federal programs that budget reviewers decide are ineffective could lose funding or face elimination in the fiscal 2004 budget cycle, President Bush's budget director said Wednesday.

Other programs may get a second chance to improve their performance, OMB Director Mitch Daniels said Wednesday. But the Office of Management and Budget may also challenge programs that are performing well-but performing missions that the federal government shouldn't be involved in, Daniels added.

"This is the major emphasis at OMB," Daniels told a group of reporters from National Journal Group publications during a roundtable interview. Daniels said the reviewers are asking two basic questions of each federal program: "Is it working?" and "Should the government be doing this in the first place?"

In an April 24 memorandum, Daniels said OMB would conduct performance reviews of 20 percent of the programs at each agency as a step toward basing budget decisions more on the results of federal spending.

Examiners are conducting the analyses using 20 standard questions and discussing the results with agency representatives during OMB's current spring review. Proposals about cutting programs or funding would be included in the fiscal 2004 budget, which President Bush will issue next February.

In the 2003 budget, the Bush administration released reviews of more than 100 federal programs, rating them as effective, moderately effective, ineffective or of unknown effectiveness (typically because of a lack of performance data).

Public administration experts have pointed out that tying spending decisions to performance reviews can be difficult because people disagree fundamentally on the goals and necessity of federal programs. For example, if the Forest Service runs an effective timber program, environmentalists might object. If the Forest Service runs an effective forest conservation program, timber companies might object.

Daniels said separating politics from performance reviews is a struggle. He said OMB will try to make its assessments "as objective as we can."

Daniels also said that OMB will review the performance of programs conducted by contractors in the same way it reviews programs performed by federal workers. "Government's job is to see that necessary services are provided. Its job is not necessarily to provide the services itself," Daniels said. The government "has to be just as rigorous on assessments of contracted services as on services performed by in-house workers."

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by Brocade

    Best of 2016 Federal Forum eBook

    Earlier this summer, Federal and tech industry leaders convened to talk security, machine learning, network modernization, DevOps, and much more at the 2016 Federal Forum. This eBook includes a useful summary highlighting the best content shared at the 2016 Federal Forum to help agencies modernize their network infrastructure.

  • Sponsored by CDW-G

    GBC Flash Poll Series: Merger & Acquisitions

    Download this GBC Flash Poll to learn more about federal perspectives on the impact of industry consolidation.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    A DevOps Roadmap for the Federal Government

    This GBC Report discusses how DevOps is steadily gaining traction among some of government's leading IT developers and agencies.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.

  • Sponsored by CDW-G

    Joint Enterprise Licensing Agreements

    Read this eBook to learn how defense agencies can achieve savings and efficiencies with an Enterprise Software Agreement.

  • Sponsored by Cloudera

    Government Forum Content Library

    Get all the essential resources needed for effective technology strategies in the federal landscape.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.