OMB accused of withholding computer security info from Congress

The Office of Management and Budget does not plan to provide detailed information to Congress on agencies' current plans to improve computer security, which could delay budget deliberations on security efforts for another year, according to the General Accounting Office.

The 2000 Government Information Security Reform Act (GISRA) directed agencies to conduct regular reviews of their security and information practices. The law required agencies to submit the first round of their security plans to OMB by September 2001, and to have programs to improve security in place by October 2002.

OMB reported to Congress in February on how well agencies' were complying with the law, praising them for some improvements, but also identifying several weaknesses. Limited resources, poor accountability and a lack of attention to computer security issues from senior management continue to hamper agencies' efforts, OMB concluded.

But OMB did not provide Congress with specific information on agencies' current plans to fix security problems, according to a May 2 letter from Robert Dacey, director of information security issues at GAO, to members of the House Government Reform Subcommittee on Government Efficiency, Financial Management and Intergovernmental Relations.

Without such information, Congress does not have a clear picture of how well agencies' current improvement plans are working and cannot properly allocate money for computer security initiatives, Dacey said.

"Regarding OMB's position on providing information on agencies' corrective action plans to the Congress, we believe that the lack of such important information for this year's plans would delay Congress' consideration of agencies' corrective actions in its oversight and budget deliberations for federal information security for another year," Dacey said.

Although Congress has an important oversight role to play in evaluating agency plans to correct information security problems, OMB must protect the confidentiality of "predecisional" information contained in those plans, OMB Director Mitch Daniels told GAO.

Dacey said OMB is working on a way to provide Congress with the necessary information on agency plans in next year's GISRA reports. "We will continue to work with OMB in an effort to find workable solutions to obtain this important information from these first-year plans, as well as from future agency corrective action plans."

Congress is now considering legislation that would permanently reauthorize GISRA. The law expires in November 2002.

President Bush has requested $4.2 billion for information security funding in fiscal 2003, which makes congressional oversight on future spending for such programs "important to ensuring that agencies are not using the funds they receive to continue ad hoc, piecemeal security fixes that are not supported by a strong agency risk management processes," Dacey said in March at hearing before the House Subcommittee on Government Efficiency, Financial Management and Intergovernmental Relations.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.