OPM’s performance report shows more commitment than measurement

The Office of Personnel Management is clearly committed to solving the major challenges it faces, but its efforts to measure human resources management at federal agencies need improvement, according to a review by the General Accounting Office. Under the 1993 Government Performance and Results Act, federal agencies must develop strategic plans, prepare annual performance plans and issue yearly performance reports. Sen. Fred Thompson, R-Tenn., asked GAO to assess the largest agencies' fiscal 2000 performance reports and fiscal 2002 performance plans and determine how well they had achieved their key goals. OPM formulates and issues human resources policies and helps agencies attract and retain employees, a role that is critical to agency efforts, said the report, "OPM: Status of Achieving Key Outcomes and Addressing Major Management Challenges"(GAO-01-884). GAO acknowledged that OPM's mission is difficult, since the results of its efforts are largely outside its direct control. Still, GAO criticized OPM for failing to develop measures that gauge the skill level of the federal workforce and assess how often federal employees are held accountable for their performance. In January, GAO identified workforce management as a major management problem in the federal government. OPM's performance goals for fiscal 2000 included: ensuring the federal workforce has the right skills to achieve the government's goals; overseeing agencies' compliance with merit system principles; making sure employees are evaluated, rewarded and held accountable for their job performance; cutting down on error and fraud in the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program (FEHBP); and ensuring that employees get timely and accurate retirement and insurance services. GAO praised OPM for revamping its mission to reflect the growing importance of helping agencies with human capital management. OPM reported progress in developing a model for workforce planning for use by federal agencies. OPM did not include measures assessing job performance accountability in its report and plan, but did include strategies to provide guidance on performance accountability to all agencies, GAO said. GAO's fiscal 2000 survey of federal managers found that few employees had been recognized for helping their agencies accomplish their goals. Although OPM's inspector general had a goal and some measures for detecting and addressing fraud in the FEHBP, GAO criticized the agency for not putting enough effort into preventing such fraud. OPM said it planned to include performance measures for this outcome in its fiscal 2003 performance plan. Overall, GAO concluded that OPM's fiscal 2000 report was an improvement over its fiscal 1999 report, and that its 2002 performance plan "continues the strengths" of the 2001 performance plan. GAO recommended that OPM make its goals and measures more reliable, link its internal human capital goals to its programs and establish a performance goal to assess fraud and error in FEHBP. OPM officials said they generally agreed with GAO's review.
Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.