OMB deputy says performance-based budgeting is top priority

President Bush's chief management priority is to link the performance goals of federal programs to agency budgets, a top administration official said Tuesday. The Bush administration is determined to put teeth behind the 1993 Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA), said Sean O'Keefe, deputy director of the Office of Management and Budget. The 1993 law requires agencies to develop performance-based goals and strategic plans to help them fulfill their missions, but most agencies have failed to effectively use GPRA as a management tool to improve their organizations. "I believe we [the Bush administration] are doing our part to make GPRA implementation a success," O'Keefe said Tuesday during a House Government Reform subcommittee hearing. "First and most critically is the President's very clear signal that he wants his administration and our government to be results-oriented." Bush plans to release a management and performance plan this summer outlining his administration's goals for making government more results-oriented, O'Keefe said. In April, the administration announced that agencies will be required to submit performance-based budgets for selected programs during the fiscal 2003 budget cycle, the first time agencies have been forced to tie their spending decisions to performance goals. O'Keefe emphasized that only certain agency programs will be required to submit performance-based budgets for fiscal 2003. Selected programs must list a specific objective, outline multiple ways to achieve that objective, and identify all the costs associated with attaining the goal. For example, achieving world peace is too broad of a goal for the State Department to accomplish, whereas combating a deadly disease by teaming up with the Health and Human Services Department to establish an AIDS trust fund has a specific focus, said O'Keefe. O'Keefe outlined OMB's top five management priorities in June. In addition to integrating performance criteria into the budget process, the administration plans to focus on managing the federal workforce, increasing competition of government services, improving financial systems and promoting e-government. Tuesday's hearing was the latest rallying cry by lawmakers and other officials to encourage federal agencies and Congress to use the Results Act to improve government performance. Last week, the General Accounting Office released a report that said only seven of 28 agencies studied found 50 percent or more of surveyed managers using performance information in setting program priorities, allocating resources, adopting new approaches, coordinating efforts or setting job expectations for their employees. Earlier this month, Sen. Fred Thompson, R-Tenn., who also testified at Tuesday's hearing, issued a comprehensive report detailing management problems in the federal government as a whole and at individual agencies, and implored the Bush administration to do something about the situation. In May, the Mercatus Center of George Mason University in Arlington, Va. released a report that said federal agencies are doing a slightly better job of telling the public what their missions are and how they plan to meet them. However, linking cost data to results and coming up with performance measures for those goals still poses challenges for most agencies, according to the report.
Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.