Bush official backs off pledge to cut 40,000 managers

The Bush administration is not going to force federal agencies to eliminate 40,000 management positions, as President Bush proposed during his campaign, Office of Management and Budget Director Mitch Daniels said Wednesday. The administration is still pushing agencies to reduce the number of managers and eliminate organizational layers, but Daniels said the workforce analyses that OMB has ordered agencies to conduct would determine the number of positions to be cut. "We don't know what the number is going to be," Daniels said at a meeting of the American Association of Budget and Program Analysis. "We'll let the facts dictate the changes." At a campaign stop in Philadelphia in June, Bush promised that, under his administration, 40,000 of the 80,000 mid- and senior-level federal managers who were expected to retire in the next eight years would not be replaced. But the Office of Personnel Management estimates that 72,913 of the 182,618 front-line, middle and senior-level supervisors and managers in the federal government will retire from 2001 to 2008. Even if half of all managers were not replaced, the Bush administration would fall short of its de-layering goal by more than 3,500 managers. In a May 8 bulletin, Daniels instructed agencies to analyze their workforces to identify the number of employees each federal supervisor oversees. The analyses must be completed by the end of June. Then agency leaders must develop restructuring plans aimed at reducing the number of managers and layers in their organizations. Agencies must submit their restructuring plans along with their fiscal 2003 budget proposals, which go to OMB in the fall. Daniels didn't mention the campaign's 40,000 target in the bulletin. At the budget analysts meeting this week, he confirmed that the administration is no longer standing by that number.
Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.