Agencies may not meet new procurement reform goal

Confusion over the requirements of performance-based contracting may keep agencies from fulfilling a key procurement reform in President Bush's management agenda, an Office of Management and Budget official said Thursday. In a March 9 memo, OMB Deputy Director Sean O'Keefe told agencies to use performance-based techniques on 20 percent of all service contracts in fiscal 2002. But even if agencies report they have met the 20 percent goal, they may still fall short of the government's standards for performance-based contracting, according to Linda Oliver, associate administrator of procurement law, legislation and innovation in the Office of Federal Procurement Policy. "I don't know if we will reach the [20 percent] goal once it has been checked," said Oliver at an outsourcing conference sponsored by the Potomac Forum, a Maryland-based training firm for federal and industry professionals. OFPP will review whether agencies are doing performance-based work by sampling contract information in the Federal Procurement Data System database. With performance-based contracting, agencies describe the end results the government needs; vendors must figure out the best way to meet those needs. Procurement officers are responsible for coding eligible contracts as "performance-based" in the Federal Procurement Data System. But many contracting officers are unaware of the government's requirements for performance-based contracts, said Oliver. "You can think you are doing performance-based contracting and not meet the standards that have been set up," she said. The Procurement Executives Council, an interagency council of top acquisition officials, has set standards for performance-based work, Oliver said. To qualify as performance-based by the council's standards, 80 percent of the dollars in a contract award must meet the four criteria of performance-based service contracts set out in the Federal Acquisition Regulation. Under the FAR, such contracts must:
  • Describe contract requirements in terms of results, not methods of work.
  • Use measurable performance standards and quality assurance surveillance plans.
  • Include performance incentives where appropriate.
  • Specify how payment will be reduced if services are not performed or do not meet requirements.
The remaining 20 percent of the dollars in a performance-based contract can be exempt from these requirements, according to a council official. "We are trying to allow agencies to get credit for doing performance-based work when not all the dollars spent [on a contract] meet performance standards," the official said. OMB will step up efforts to inform agencies about these standards, according to Oliver. At present, the standards are not listed on the Web sites of the Procurement Executive Council or OMB, although they may be found in amendment four to the reporting manual for the Federal Procurement Data System. OMB plans to release a guidebook on performance-based contracting in the next few months to help contracting officers learn how to write performance-based contracts. The Pentagon released a similar training guidebook in January. OMB has also resolved some details about how the 20 percent goal will be implemented, according to an official familiar with the process. The agency will apply the 20 percent target only to service contracts worth $100,000 or more, said the official. O'Keefe's March 9 memo applied the 20 percent goal to contracts worth $25,000 or more. Members of the Procurement Executives Council urged this revision so the performance-based directive would not conflict with existing guidance on procurements less than $100,000. The March 9 memo also restricts the 20 percent target to "total eligible service contracting dollars." OMB will exempt architecture and engineering and construction contracts from the performance-based goal, the official said.
Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Going Agile:Revolutionizing Federal Digital Services Delivery

    Here’s one indication that times have changed: Harriet Tubman is going to be the next face of the twenty dollar bill. Another sign of change? The way in which the federal government arrived at that decision.

  • Cyber Risk Report: Cybercrime Trends from 2016

    In our first half 2016 cyber trends report, SurfWatch Labs threat intelligence analysts noted one key theme – the interconnected nature of cybercrime – and the second half of the year saw organizations continuing to struggle with that reality. The number of potential cyber threats, the pool of already compromised information, and the ease of finding increasingly sophisticated cybercriminal tools continued to snowball throughout the year.

  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

  • GBC Issue Brief: The Future of 9-1-1

    A Look Into the Next Generation of Emergency Services

  • GBC Survey Report: Securing the Perimeters

    A candid survey on cybersecurity in state and local governments

  • The New IP: Moving Government Agencies Toward the Network of The Future

    Federal IT managers are looking to modernize legacy network infrastructures that are taxed by growing demands from mobile devices, video, vast amounts of data, and more. This issue brief discusses the federal government network landscape, as well as market, financial force drivers for network modernization.

  • eBook: State & Local Cybersecurity

    CenturyLink is committed to helping state and local governments meet their cybersecurity challenges. Towards that end, CenturyLink commissioned a study from the Government Business Council that looked at the perceptions, attitudes and experiences of state and local leaders around the cybersecurity issue. The results were surprising in a number of ways. Learn more about their findings and the ways in which state and local governments can combat cybersecurity threats with this eBook.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.