Administration plans first ‘results-based organization’

The Bush administration has given a new name-and new life-to a Clinton administration proposal to let federal managers run their offices more like private businesses. The birthplace of the resurrected idea is an obscure State Department office with a private sector-style mission: the Foreign Buildings Operation, which serves as the landlord for U.S. facilities overseas. In 1996, Vice President Al Gore proposed turning many federal agencies into performance-based organizations, or PBOs. Under that concept, agency executives would be allowed to make personnel changes and purchases more easily than at other federal agencies. In return, the executives would promise to improve their agencies' performance within a few years.

On paper, three agencies became PBOs during the Clinton years: the Education Department's Office of Student Financial Assistance, the Patent and Trademark Office and the Federal Aviation Administration's air traffic services office. Now the Bush administration is proposing to turn State's Foreign Buildings Operation into its first results-based organization, or RBO. "We need flexibility with hiring and procurement practices," said Foreign Buildings Operation chief Chuck Williams, a retired Army Corps of Engineers general whom Secretary of State Colin Powell appointed in March to "turn around" the much-criticized office. "If I need a geotechnical engineer [immediately], I need to have the ability to hire that person directly from the private sector, and get them hired quickly. If I have a non-performer, it shouldn't take five years to get that person off the rolls," Williams said. The Foreign Buildings Operation builds, maintains and secures American embassies abroad. Several reports in recent years have criticized the office for not having a capital planning process and for completing projects behind schedule and above cost. Williams said the reports were on the mark. "The Secretary asked me to come in and do my own assessment. I took about six weeks and did that, and I basically concluded that the Foreign Buildings Operation in its current posture and organizational focus couldn't get its job done," Williams said. Williams' assessment came as the Bush administration proposed $1.3 billion in embassy security, construction and maintenance work in 2002-money that the Foreign Buildings Operation would be expected to spend wisely. Powell and Williams agreed to move the office out from under State's Bureau of Administration so that Williams reports directly to Grant Green, Powell's management chief. Williams then began reorganizing the office into what he calls "accountability cells" that are focused on specific functions such as planning, development and real estate management. Williams is setting up performance agreements with each of the senior managers in the 700-person office and has set some basic targets for the whole organization, including getting embassy construction costs down and speeding up the office's work. He is also figuring out a way to charge other agencies that use State Department facilities a fee for the office's landlord-like services. "We think all of this is going to be a model for how a government operation should run when it can align itself to look like a business entity," Williams said. To make the Foreign Buildings Operation more like a business, the State Department will ask Congress to free the office from governmentwide procurement and personnel rules. Rep. Earl Blumenauer, D-Ore., said on the House floor last week that he would propose an addition to the Foreign Affairs authorization bill that would turn Williams' office into a results-based organization. Lawmakers are debating the bill this month. "I have a great interest in bringing about common-sense practices in the planning and management of our overseas buildings infrastructure," Blumenauer said. "I am impressed with the business-like approach being taken by Gen. Chuck Williams." Other agencies have faced opposition to personnel rule changes. To become a PBO, the Patent and Trademark Office had to guarantee its workers' unions that employees would still be provided with merit system protections under Title 5 of the U.S. Code. If those protections were removed, "people would feel very vulnerable," said Ronald Stern, president of the Patent Office Professionals Association. Similarly, some federal procurement officials have said that agencies don't need special exemptions from government acquisition rules because those rules have been loosened over the past decade. Jerry Ellig, a senior research fellow at George Mason University's Mercatus Center in Arlington, Va., said either the performance- or results-based organization approach could be considered for a variety of federal operations. "As long as they have the idea right, it doesn't matter what they call it," Ellig said.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by Brocade

    Best of 2016 Federal Forum eBook

    Earlier this summer, Federal and tech industry leaders convened to talk security, machine learning, network modernization, DevOps, and much more at the 2016 Federal Forum. This eBook includes a useful summary highlighting the best content shared at the 2016 Federal Forum to help agencies modernize their network infrastructure.

  • Sponsored by CDW-G

    GBC Flash Poll Series: Merger & Acquisitions

    Download this GBC Flash Poll to learn more about federal perspectives on the impact of industry consolidation.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    A DevOps Roadmap for the Federal Government

    This GBC Report discusses how DevOps is steadily gaining traction among some of government's leading IT developers and agencies.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.

  • Sponsored by CDW-G

    Joint Enterprise Licensing Agreements

    Read this eBook to learn how defense agencies can achieve savings and efficiencies with an Enterprise Software Agreement.

  • Sponsored by Cloudera

    Government Forum Content Library

    Get all the essential resources needed for effective technology strategies in the federal landscape.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.