Bush to link agencies' budgets to performance in 2003

The Bush administration has mandated that agencies use performance-based budgeting on selected programs in the fiscal 2003 budget cycle, according to the 2002 budget unveiled Monday. Agencies will be required to submit performance-based budgets for selected programs in the fiscal 2003 budget process, the first time agencies have been forced to tie their spending decisions to performance goals. The budget does not say what programs will be chosen for performance-based budgeting. Program managers will be held accountable for meeting performance targets, the budget states. Experts hailed the administration's proposal but cautioned that the success of the budgeting method will depend on involvement from Congress and the Office of Management and Budget. "I think it is a very positive sign," said Donald Kettl, a scholar with the University of Wisconsin's LaFollette Institute of Public Affairs. "This is really the first effort to directly couple the amount of money going in [to agencies] with the results going out." Still, performance budgeting could delay the traditional budget process, according to Kettl and Dall Forsythe, senior fellow at the Rockefeller Institute, a think tank affiliated with the State University of New York at Albany. "When resource allocation revolves solely around financial data, appropriators can make choices without involving substantive issues. With performance budgeting, substantive committees put their hands up and say, 'we should be part of the [budgeting] decision too,' " said Forsythe. Linking performance with funding will likely spur conflict among stakeholders who disagree with agency performance goals, said Kettl. Performance budgeting could also become a "paperwork exercise" if Congress fails to use performance data to guide budgetary decisions, he added. "If Congress doesn't pay attention to [performance information], it dramatically reduces its opportunity to have an impact," said Kettl. The 1993 Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA) calls for pilot projects in performance budgeting, but few agencies have volunteered to participate. Most agencies link budget requests to expenses (such as salaries, travel and equipment) instead of performance goals. The fiscal 2003 budget will include more performance information and the fiscal 2004 budget will integrate performance and budget data, according to next year's budget. The budget provides further details on a range of the President's government reform initiatives. The administration has doubled its initial proposal for an e-government fund that would finance interagency e-government initiatives. The budget proposes a first installment of $20 million for the fund, which will grow to $100 million over three years. The Office of Management and Budget would distribute allocations from the fund. The administration will also seek new legislation to improve accountability within the civil service system. The document proposes to change federal budgeting methods to give program managers budgetary authority for support services and capital assets. Legislation to give managers more tools to restructure the federal workforce is also in the works, according to the budget. But managers already have a variety of tools for structuring the federal workforce, noted a staffer with the House Government Reform Committee. "As [Comptroller General] David Walker has said, 90 percent of what agencies need to do can be done administratively," said the staffer. "There may not be a need for legislation." OMB spokesman Chris Ullman would not elaborate on what measures the administration is considering for restructuring the federal workforce. As part of a broader effort to make government citizen-centered, the budget also pledges to restructure federal management by cutting away layers in the upper levels of government and moving higher-level managers to front-line service delivery positions. Although the document provides no specific numbers on job cuts, OMB directed agencies to include specific "de-layering" goals in their fiscal 2002 performance plans, which were due to Congress Monday.
Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
FROM OUR SPONSORS
JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Close [ x ] More from GovExec
 
 

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Going Agile:Revolutionizing Federal Digital Services Delivery

    Here’s one indication that times have changed: Harriet Tubman is going to be the next face of the twenty dollar bill. Another sign of change? The way in which the federal government arrived at that decision.

    Download
  • Cyber Risk Report: Cybercrime Trends from 2016

    In our first half 2016 cyber trends report, SurfWatch Labs threat intelligence analysts noted one key theme – the interconnected nature of cybercrime – and the second half of the year saw organizations continuing to struggle with that reality. The number of potential cyber threats, the pool of already compromised information, and the ease of finding increasingly sophisticated cybercriminal tools continued to snowball throughout the year.

    Download
  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

    Download
  • GBC Issue Brief: The Future of 9-1-1

    A Look Into the Next Generation of Emergency Services

    Download
  • GBC Survey Report: Securing the Perimeters

    A candid survey on cybersecurity in state and local governments

    Download
  • The New IP: Moving Government Agencies Toward the Network of The Future

    Federal IT managers are looking to modernize legacy network infrastructures that are taxed by growing demands from mobile devices, video, vast amounts of data, and more. This issue brief discusses the federal government network landscape, as well as market, financial force drivers for network modernization.

    Download
  • eBook: State & Local Cybersecurity

    CenturyLink is committed to helping state and local governments meet their cybersecurity challenges. Towards that end, CenturyLink commissioned a study from the Government Business Council that looked at the perceptions, attitudes and experiences of state and local leaders around the cybersecurity issue. The results were surprising in a number of ways. Learn more about their findings and the ways in which state and local governments can combat cybersecurity threats with this eBook.

    Download

When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.