Air Force sets example for long-term planning

Successful long-term agency planning requires federal career civil servants and political appointees to trust each other and to use innovative thinking, according to a recent report from the PricewaterhouseCoopers Endowment for the Business of Government. In "Corporate Strategic Planning in Government: Lessons from the United States Air Force," Colin Campbell, a public policy professor at Georgetown University, suggested that federal leaders need to envision the range of roles their agencies may play in the future and plan accordingly, instead of just projecting current programs into the future. Agencies should engage in role-playing and imagine the various scenarios in which they may find themselves, Campbell said. Such innovative thinking is key to long-term corporate strategic planning in government, he said. But, so is building trust and establishing strong communication between career employees and political appointees, Campbell wrote. "If departmental secretaries in the U.S. choose to engage in corporate strategic planning, they must, by the nature of the system, enter a dialogue with permanent officials. Officials, thus, will find it hard to bring authoritative corporate change if their political appointees have not participated in the process," wrote Campbell. Campbell praised Gen. Ronald Fogleman, Air Force chief of staff from 1994 to 1997, for imagining how technology and other external events could transform the way the Air Force does business 25 years in the future, and for attempting to instill that type of 'forward-thinking' into the agency culture. Fogleman believed that by 2025, the Air Force would evolve from a fixed-wing aircraft culture into one focused on space missions. According to Campbell, this kind of innovative thinking enables agencies to develop long-range strategic plans and evaluate the kind of resources they will need to achieve those goals. Fogleman's persistence and willingness to include a broad range of Air Force and Pentagon colleagues in planning sessions about the future of the Air Force was important, said Campbell. Although the Air Force ultimately had problems implementing Fogleman's vision, the foundation for changing the way the agency viewed long-range strategic planning was laid, Campbell said. "The Air Force leadership has become more aware of the challenges presented by this gap [between its vision and its program] and has increased greatly its institutional effort to narrow it," Campbell said. Campbell acknowledged that, for some federal agencies, gazing into a crystal ball 25 years hence does not seem practical. However, agencies should structure strategic goals around their own individual timeframes. Such long-range thinking for programs such as Social Security and Medicare would be particularly beneficial, he said.
Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.