Agencies get lackluster computer security grades

The federal government's computer security practices deserve an overall grade of D-, according to Rep. Stephen Horn, R-Calif., chairman of the House Government Reform Subcommittee for Management, Information and Technology.

In unveiling his first "report card" for computer security on Monday, Horn assigned federal agencies grades based on their self-reported answers to subcommittee and General Accounting Office questions. The Social Security Administration (B) and the National Science Foundation (B-) garnered the highest grades.

Among those agencies that received an F were Justice and Labor departments, as well as the Small Business Administration and the Office of Personnel Management.

"Obviously, there is a great deal of work ahead," Horn said, armed with a GAO report that found "serious and widespread weaknesses" in each of 24 major federal agencies' computer security systems. "Each agency must recognize that the daily challenges to their computer systems will continue to grow in number and sophistication," said Horn, who graded federal agencies last year on their preparedness for the Year 2000 computer date conversion.

The Commerce, Education, State, Housing and Urban Development departments and the Agency for International Development, received grades of C or C-, and the Defense and Treasury departments, as well as the Environment Protection Agency, General Services Administration and NASA, received grades of D+, D, or D-. Among those agencies receiving an incomplete grade due to lack of information were the Department of Energy and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

Officials at the Office of Management and Budget, who are responsible for overseeing federal agencies' computer security practices, disputed the legitimacy of a system that assigned a single grade to a complex security system.

"We have concerns that a grading system can be misleading, and whether those ratings have given an accurate snapshot of the efforts federal agencies have taken to safeguard citizens' information," said John Spotila, administrator of OMB's Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs.

Out of 100 points, Horn's grades were based on whether agencies had established entity-wide security programs (29 points), access controls (26 points), the ability to continuously provide service even when unexpected events occur (18 points), checks on unauthorized change in computer programs (12 points), limiting access to sensitive operating system files (12 points) and segregation of duties controls (3 points).

Daryl White, CIO for the Interior Department, and Edward Hugler, deputy assistant secretary at the Labor Department, attributed their agencies' poor grades-17 and 38 points respectively, the two lowest-to budget cuts in their agency's IT budgets. Hugler also noted that the data was a year old, and the agency had since taken corrective actions.

Rep. J. C. Watts, R-OK, chairman of the House Republican Conference and the Republican Cyber-Security Team, seized upon the results as evidence that government needs to do a better job of protecting its critical information systems. "It is our sworn duty as public officials to defend U.S. citizens as well as to protect national security secrets and other critical information from getting into the wrong hands," he said.

Horn's Grades for Agencies' Computer Security Efforts
September 11, 2000

Agency Grade
Ed. C
State C
Commerce C-
Defense D+
Treasury D
Agriculture F
Justice F
Labor F
Interior F
Energy INC
Transportation INC
Overall D-
Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.