Fedblog
Common Ground on Cutting Retirement?
- By Charles S. Clark
- February 22, 2013
- Comments
As President Obama and GOP leaders continue their Alphonse and Gaston routine for avoiding action to head off sequestration, at least one area of potential agreement has come into focus.
A White House blog post on Thursday emphasized that Obama’s proposal for the long-discussed “grand bargain” is “still on the table” for House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, to take up. In addition to revenue hikes, the 10-year, $1.8 trillion deficit reduction plan includes $200 billion “non-health mandatory savings.”
Among those cuts is $35 billion through “reforming federal retirement programs.”
Just the day before, House Majority Leader Eric Cantor, R-Va., had proposed “updating the federal employee retirement system to more closely track with the private sector,” to save $21 billion.
No matter how the stalemate is eventually resolved, it would seem, changes are in store for retirement benefits.
By using this service you agree not to post material that is obscene, harassing, defamatory, or otherwise objectionable. Although GovExec.com does not monitor comments posted to this site (and has no obligation to), it reserves the right to delete, edit, or move any material that it deems to be in violation of this rule.
Is Your Privacy Worth 50 Foiled Terror Plots?
Postal Service Eyes Cuba
Tangherlini As GSA's Mr. Fix-It?
Lew Cleans Up Signature for the Nation's Currency
The Plan to Open More Military Jobs to Women
Should Leaders Ever Lie?
Sponsored
Event: Digital Government Success: Meeting the Call for 21st Century Government
What Big Data Means for TSA & Airport Security
Cutting costs: Inside the effort to improve the efficiency of federal operations
