Fedblog FedblogFedblog
Government Executive Editor in Chief Tom Shoop, along with other editors and staff correspondents, look at the federal bureaucracy from the outside in.

A New NASA Logo

SHARE
ARCHIVES

Does NASA need a new logo? The design firm Base thinks so. The agency "is doing super-cool, interesting, worthwhile things, and is completely undersold by its logo," the firm says. That would be this, known as the "meatball":

meatball.jpg

So what does the design firm suggest? That a new approach should "de-emphasize the name in the logo to create more of a symbol that would be universally understood." Like this:

base-for-nasa.jpg

Pretty cool, but if you asked me what message it sends, I'd say this: "An agency in eclipse." Not sure that's what NASA needs.

By the way, this wouldn't be the first time NASA experimented with a new logo. While the meatball dates back to the agency's creation in 1959, in 1975, the NASA switched to what officials thought would be a more contemporary look that emphasized the agency's name. It became known as the "worm":

NASAWorm_logo.svg.png

In 1992, agency leaders decided they liked the classic look better, and they've stuck with the tried-and-true ever since.

Hat tip: Atlantic Wire

Tom Shoop is vice president and editor in chief at Government Executive Media Group, where he oversees both print and online editorial operations. He started as associate editor of Government Executive magazine in 1989; launched the company’s flagship website, GovExec.com, in 1996; and was named editor in chief in 2007.

JOIN THE DISCUSSION
More from GovExec