Fedblog
A New NASA Logo
Does NASA need a new logo? The design firm Base thinks so. The agency "is doing super-cool, interesting, worthwhile things, and is completely undersold by its logo," the firm says. That would be this, known as the "meatball":
So what does the design firm suggest? That a new approach should "de-emphasize the name in the logo to create more of a symbol that would be universally understood." Like this:
Pretty cool, but if you asked me what message it sends, I'd say this: "An agency in eclipse." Not sure that's what NASA needs.
By the way, this wouldn't be the first time NASA experimented with a new logo. While the meatball dates back to the agency's creation in 1959, in 1975, the NASA switched to what officials thought would be a more contemporary look that emphasized the agency's name. It became known as the "worm":

In 1992, agency leaders decided they liked the classic look better, and they've stuck with the tried-and-true ever since.
Hat tip: Atlantic Wire
Tom Shoop is vice president and editor in chief at Government Executive Media Group, where he oversees both print and online editorial operations. He started as associate editor of Government Executive magazine in 1989; launched the company’s flagship website, GovExec.com, in 1996; and was named editor in chief in 2007.
Taking Bots Into Battle
Contracting Provision Irks White House
The Untapped Potential of Data Analytics
Bracing for the Worst in Budget Requests
The Washington Bubble
Gimme My Discount! Deals for Feds
