Super committee meets Gang of Six

Members of the bipartisan "Gang of Six" met behind closed doors on Wednesday with the super committee to explain their plan from earlier this year to cut about $3.7 trillion from the nation's deficit over 10 years.

Afterward, it remained unclear exactly how interested the 12 Republicans and Democrats on the new panel were in that earlier plan -- or specific elements of it -- as they continue to race against a Nov. 23 deadline to come up with their own strategy for at least $1.2 trillion in savings.

Asked about the Gang of Six's tax recommendations, Rep. Jeb Hensarling, R-Texas, a member of the new panel, said, "I think it's a group of very serious members who understand the gravity of the situation. They will admit that there were a number of specifics that were left out of their plan."

The meeting at the Capitol was kept private, although as recently as last week others in Congress -- including House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif. -- have been calling for any such discussion between the new and old deficit-reduction panels to be conducted in public.

Instead, members of both panels emerged from their private session, offering little insight and no specifics.

"We very much appreciated the chance to go into significant detail the conclusions we came to," said Sen. Kent Conrad, D-N.D.

But aside from explaining that he and others on the Gang of Six spent time discussing their earlier plan, Conrad and the others declined to answer questions about what else, if anything, occurred. "I think it would be inappropriate for me to say any more," Conrad said. "We've been asked to respect the deliberations of the committee. And I certainly do respect them."

"As a nation, we need a balanced, comprehensive plan to get this debt under control, and it's absolutely essential we do," he added.

Sen. Saxby Chambliss, R-Ga., another Gang of Six member, said the super committee faces a big challenge, but that, "we're very confident at the end of the day they're going to produce something positive." Sen. Mark Warner, D-Va., added, "We want them to do their job...and make some bold choices."

Two members of the super committee, Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., and Rep. James Clyburn, D-S.C., said only that it was a good meeting.

In saying "balanced, comprehensive plan," Conrad used a term often coined for the outline of a deficit-reduction plan that the Gang of Six recommended. It would have relied on several approaches -- reducing both security and non-security discretionary spending, enacting some Medicare reforms, and reforming the U.S. tax code to gain about $1 trillion in added revenues. Some of its elements were itself based on an earlier presidential deficit-reduction commission.

But the Gang of Six plan got set aside during this summer's battle between President Obama and congressional Republicans over increasing the nation's debt limit. Since then, however, more than 40 senators from both parties have endorsed all or part of it.

Katy O'Donnell contributed to this story.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
FROM OUR SPONSORS
JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Close [ x ] More from GovExec
 
 

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

    Download
  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

    Download
  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

    Download
  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

    Download
  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

    Download
  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

    Download
  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security

    Download

When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.