Pentagon performance management transition faulted

The Defense Department does not have a clear plan for evaluating the performance of employees transitioned out of the controversial National Security Personnel System, according to a new audit.

In a report issued on Thursday to the House Armed Services Committee, the Government Accountability Office found that the Pentagon has failed to set clear goals or a timeline for developing a new performance management system to replace NSPS, the George W. Bush administration's merit-based pay system that was repealed through a provision in the fiscal 2010 Defense authorization law. Defense has begun working with unions to design a new system, but officials told GAO that plans still are in the early stages.

"We agree that it may be too early to define what DoD's final goals are for a new performance management system; however, by not having interim goals and a timeline that are linked to funding, DoD is not positioned to determine whether it is making progress or if resources are appropriate for the near-term efforts," wrote Brenda Farrell, director of defense capabilities and management issues at GAO.

According to the report, Defense also has failed to track costs associated with the termination of NSPS, thus limiting Congress's ability to track progress. The department estimated that the transition would cost $238.6 million in fiscal 2011 but did not provide documentation to support that number, GAO said. The audit also found inconsistencies in cost data.

Matt Biggs, legislative and political director at the International Federation of Professional and Technical Engineers, said Defense deserves credit for making the transition out of NSPS as smooth as possible. The department early on failed to account for the cost of NSPS' creation, which was in part intentional but also a result of insufficient tracking, he said, noting that GAO's findings are not surprising.

"I don't think the failure to track costs for this post-NSPS transition has anything to do with malfeasance, but is merely reflective of a larger problem at the DoD to properly account for how much this is costing," Biggs said. "It is a larger problem over there that screams for more scrutiny from Congress, particularly in these very tight budgetary years."

In its response to a draft of the report, Defense agreed in part with GAO's recommendations that it improve documentation of transition costs and develop a plan for the new performance management system. It noted it will develop detailed goals and timelines in the future.

Congress last year repealed NSPS and gave the department until Jan. 1, 2012, to roll back the pay-for-performance system completely. Defense transferred nearly 172,000 employees, or 76 percent, back to the General Schedule in fiscal 2010, in keeping with department estimates. As of April 22, 197,547 employees have transitioned out of NSPS.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by Brocade

    Best of 2016 Federal Forum eBook

    Earlier this summer, Federal and tech industry leaders convened to talk security, machine learning, network modernization, DevOps, and much more at the 2016 Federal Forum. This eBook includes a useful summary highlighting the best content shared at the 2016 Federal Forum to help agencies modernize their network infrastructure.

  • Sponsored by CDW-G

    GBC Flash Poll Series: Merger & Acquisitions

    Download this GBC Flash Poll to learn more about federal perspectives on the impact of industry consolidation.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    A DevOps Roadmap for the Federal Government

    This GBC Report discusses how DevOps is steadily gaining traction among some of government's leading IT developers and agencies.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.

  • Sponsored by CDW-G

    Joint Enterprise Licensing Agreements

    Read this eBook to learn how defense agencies can achieve savings and efficiencies with an Enterprise Software Agreement.

  • Sponsored by Cloudera

    Government Forum Content Library

    Get all the essential resources needed for effective technology strategies in the federal landscape.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.