Waxman cites threats in his probe of State Department IG

House Oversight and Government Reform Chairman Henry Waxman, D-Calif., on Friday accused senior officials in the office of State Department Inspector General Howard Krongard of trying to intimidate investigators who are cooperating with the committee's ongoing probe into whether Krongard improperly blocked investigations.

"This week, several current employees in your office -- including two who have agreed to go on the record -- informed the committee that your senior staff attempted to coerce them not to cooperate with the committee's inquiry and threatened their job and careers," Waxman wrote Friday in a letter to Krongard.

A spokeswoman said the IG's office has fully cooperated in the investigation but said she could not comment on the accuracy of the charges in the letter.

On Sept. 18, Waxman released a letter he wrote to Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice describing allegations by current and former employees in Krongard's office that the inspector general tried to shield the Bush administration from embarrassment by repeatedly shutting down investigations into fraud and abuse in Iraq and Afghanistan, as well as other irregularities.

Since the committee announced its investigations into those charges, officials under Krongard have improperly tried to dissuade other employees from cooperating with the committee, Waxman said Friday.

His latest letter says two officials -- Special Agent Ron Militana and Assistant Special Agent in Charge Brian Rubendall -- claim that in a Monday meeting, the IG's congressional liaison, Terry Heide, with an attorney from the office present, told them they could face retaliation based on their cooperation with the committee.

Heide allegedly advised them not to agree to voluntary interviews, Waxman said.

"You have no protection against reprisal. You have no whistleblower protections. Howard [Krongard] could retaliate and you would have no recourse," Heide allegedly said, based on Militana's notes, which he gave the committee. "Howard can fire you," Heide said later, according to the notes.

Though the meeting was supposed to be advisory, Waxman's letter says the investigators felt it was threatening. Waxman said other employees, who asked not to be identified because they feared retaliation, reported similar meetings.

An official familiar with the investigation said several employees involved have filed whistleblower disclosures with the independent Office of Special Counsel to ensure protection from retaliation. Waxman said the description of the meeting indicates officials may have violated civil and criminal laws against tampering with witnesses and retaliating against whistleblowers.

"The committee will not tolerate any intimidation of potential witnesses," Waxman wrote Friday.

"I direct you to instruct your staff, including your congressional affairs liaison and attorneys, to suspend all communications (other than those necessary to collect responsive documents) with employees the committee is planning to interview," he said. "I also warn you against any further efforts to intimidate witnesses or prevent truthful communications with Congress."

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.