Appeals court deals blow to unions in Defense personnel case

An appeals court has rejected a request from federal employee unions for a full court review of a panel's decision upholding rules that would scale back collective bargaining rights for civilian Defense Department employees.

The coalition of unions that had asked the full U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia to review a May ruling in favor of the Defense Department will now take the case to the Supreme Court, said Joe Goldberg, lead attorney for the group. The unions represent more than half the civilian employees affected by personnel changes at the Pentagon.

The coalition also will ask that the appeals court delay issuing the mandate that will accompany Friday's decision not to rehear the case, a maneuver that would essentially give the unions more time to work out their next move.

The National Federation of Federal Employees -- one of the unions involved in the case - expressed disappointment in the appeals court's move. "We feel this case meets all the criteria for a rehearing, and choosing not to grant it is a disservice to the 750,000 Defense workers who deserve a fair shake on this all-important matter," said Richard Brown, president of NFFE.

The full appeals court's refusal to review the case lets stand the May ruling by a panel of judges that the Defense Department has the authority to limit employees' collective bargaining rights until 2009, at which time the agency must revert to the labor practices outlined in the 1978 Civil Service Reform Act.

The Defense Department's privilege has come into play as the agency works to implement the National Security Personnel System, which, in addition to the collective bargaining provisions, seeks to tie pay more closely to job performance. Unions have criticized the new system, saying it promotes hiring decisions based on ideology rather than performance.

"[NSPS] is costing taxpayers money needlessly to implement a personnel policy that has nothing to do with performance," said Matt Biggs, legislative director for the International Federation of Professional and Technical Engineers, one of the unions in the coalition. In addition to legal action, the unions have pushed Congress to block the personnel reforms. The House earlier this month approved a bipartisan spending bill amendment that would protect the collective bargaining and appeal rights of Defense employees.

Language to reform or repeal NSPS also has been included in House and Senate versions of the 2008 Defense authorization bills. In May, the House voted to repeal the existing authority of Defense to move forward on the labor relations portions. So far, the full Senate has failed to move on its version of the authorization bill, which would permit the Pentagon to go forward with personnel reforms, as long as the system is consistent with existing federal labor relations law.

"We're very optimistic that NSPS as we know it right now is going to be fixed," Biggs said. "We have bipartisan support."

Lt. Col. Les' Melnyk, a Defense Department spokesman, said that while it is against agency policy to comment on open legal proceedings, Defense supports the personnel overhaul.

"NSPS is what's needed to reform the civilian workforce for the war on terror," Melnyk said. He said there are "protections under the system" for employees' bargaining rights.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.