Union to appeal ruling on election to represent DHS workers

The American Federation of Government Employees announced Thursday that it plans to appeal a recent decision rejecting allegations of procedural flaws and bias in a 2006 election to determine union representation of more than 20,000 Homeland Security Department employees.

The Jan. 17 decision from the Federal Labor Relations Authority's Washington, D.C., regional office ordered the certification of AFGE's opponent, the National Treasury Employees Union, as the winner of the election at DHS' Customs and Border Protection bureau. But AFGE General Counsel Mark Roth argued in a statement that the regional FLRA office "got wrong a number of issues dealing with the numerous advantages and institutional benefits CBP provided NTEU during the campaign."

AFGE will appeal the regional decision to the full FLRA. The union did not specify when it intended to file, but it has until March 19 to do so. Union officials said they were planning to take some time to look at the regional director's decision and would probably file closer to next month's deadline.

The need for the election arose when CBP sought to consolidate its non-Border Patrol employees -- represented by three different unions based on the agencies they had worked for prior to the March 2003 creation of DHS -- under a single labor group. AFGE filed its first appeal of the results shortly after NTEU won last June with 7,369 votes to AFGE's 3,426.

AFGE officials said one of the union's major concerns was the lack of fair and equal access to CBP employees prior to the election. NTEU represented more than double the number of CBP employees AFGE did going into the election.

"CBP effectively cut off AFGE's ability to communicate with CBP employees prior to the election, and we won't back down until this injustice is made right," Roth said.

AFGE argued that a "precedential issue" underlies the appeal, claiming that since the Sept. 11 attacks, access to high-security employees has been virtually blocked. This includes access to information as basic as names and work locations, the union said.

AFGE said a request for both unions to have the right to one mailing at their own cost to all eligible voters was denied.

But NTEU President Colleen Kelley said CBP provided a list of eligible employees to all unions representing the agency's employees in December 2004.

"The [FLRA] regional director's decision stated that CBP was not required to agree with AFGE's mailing proposal, and its refusal to do so did not affect the free choice of the voters or the outcome of the election," Kelley said. "CBP had a responsibility to be neutral, not to conduct our campaigns for us."

Delaying the certification of election results would prolong the period of uncertainty about representation and contract rights for newly hired employees at CBP, the union argued. NTEU also contended that the delay would prevent it from seeking contract benefits such as extra pay for bilingual immigration employees, agriculture specialists and other new members. The appeal also would prevent NTEU from moving forward and seeking contract improvements for all employees in key areas such as work assignments, bid and rotation, overtime and alternative work schedules. Kelley said she is "absolutely appalled" by AFGE's decision to appeal, stating that the action "has the impact of depriving thousands of CBP employees from having any union representation."

She added that NTEU representation of CBP employees takes on even greater importance given Wednesday's disclosure that Homeland Security employees ranked their agency at or near the bottom in four major categories identified in a recent Office of Personnel Management survey of job satisfaction and management challenges across the federal workforce.

Kelley wrote to AFGE President John Gage immediately following FLRA's decision last month, asking Gage to "act in the best interest of CBP employees and refrain from further delaying certification with a final appeal."

But Gage fired back Thursday, stating that "the decision to appeal has no bearing on the rights of CBP employees." Gage said that while awaiting the decision on the second appeal, AFGE will continue to aggressively represent its members within CBP.

FLRA would have to rule on any application by AFGE to review the regional office's decision no later than 60 days after receipt. The appeal could push certification of the election results as late as May.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
FROM OUR SPONSORS
JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Close [ x ] More from GovExec
 
 

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Forecasting Cloud's Future

    Conversations with Federal, State, and Local Technology Leaders on Cloud-Driven Digital Transformation

    Download
  • The Big Data Campaign Trail

    With everyone so focused on security following recent breaches at federal, state and local government and education institutions, there has been little emphasis on the need for better operations. This report breaks down some of the biggest operational challenges in IT management and provides insight into how agencies and leaders can successfully solve some of the biggest lingering government IT issues.

    Download
  • Communicating Innovation in Federal Government

    Federal Government spending on ‘obsolete technology’ continues to increase. Supporting the twin pillars of improved digital service delivery for citizens on the one hand, and the increasingly optimized and flexible working practices for federal employees on the other, are neither easy nor inexpensive tasks. This whitepaper explores how federal agencies can leverage the value of existing agency technology assets while offering IT leaders the ability to implement the kind of employee productivity, citizen service improvements and security demanded by federal oversight.

    Download
  • IT Transformation Trends: Flash Storage as a Strategic IT Asset

    MIT Technology Review: Flash Storage As a Strategic IT Asset For the first time in decades, IT leaders now consider all-flash storage as a strategic IT asset. IT has become a new operating model that enables self-service with high performance, density and resiliency. It also offers the self-service agility of the public cloud combined with the security, performance, and cost-effectiveness of a private cloud. Download this MIT Technology Review paper to learn more about how all-flash storage is transforming the data center.

    Download
  • Ongoing Efforts in Veterans Health Care Modernization

    This report discusses the current state of veterans health care

    Download

When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.