Lawmakers, administration clash over science funding

Lawmakers from both parties on Wednesday lamented the proposed fiscal 2008 research and development budget for the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, while an administration official said NASA's future is at risk due to current congressional funding levels.

At a House Science and Technology Committee hearing, panel Chairman Bart Gordon, D-Tenn., also said the administration's R&D proposals ignore critical areas that experts have highlighted in past committee hearings -- namely teacher training and science education.

The committee convened to discuss the overall R&D budget request, "which really means" discussing "our nation's future competitiveness," Gordon said. Under the president's budget, he said, physical sciences would see gains under the American competitiveness initiative proposed by President Bush, but the money would be "more than offset by decreases to NASA science programs, among other cuts."

Overall funding for the National Science Foundation would increase, but "once again, funding for education programs at NSF would decline," Gordon said. "Not only does the American competitiveness initiative not focus on teacher training, it does not even contain a single science education component."

He also noted that NASA is not included in the president's competitiveness agenda, and he questioned whether that means the administration does not view aeronautics, earth and space sciences as "world-class" sciences.

John Marburger, director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, said the administration values NASA, "but frankly it's funded better than the physical sciences in these other agencies that have been under-funded for a long time -- and we need to catch up."

Committee ranking Republican Ralph Hall of Texas said it is important to "keep our word" with our international partners on planned space endeavors. A proposal to increase science, aeronautics and exploration funding by 3.1 percent may not be sufficient to ensure that NASA meets the president's goal of retiring the space-shuttle fleet in 2010 and launching a new spaceship in 2014.

Marburger said fiscal 2007 congressional funding would leave NASA at its fiscal 2006 level, with no increase, and would jeopardize the vision for space exploration plus priority earth and space science missions.

As for education funding, Marburger said the president's 2002 education law already has embarked on the reforms necessary to fuel competitiveness. In addition, the president has asked for $30 million in his 2008 NSF education budget for new awards under a mathematics and science education program for elementary and secondary schools.

"By no means has this component been ignored by the administration in terms of laying the foundation for future economic competitiveness," Marburger said.

Gordon maintained that the 2002 law is different than the competitiveness issue.

When a committee member broached the matter of nanotechnology R&D and its health consequences, Gordon said the committee will explore the issue over the next year. "I am very concerned that this field could meet something of the same fate as [genetically modified] grain," where the technology emerges before the public's faith and trust, he said.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.