Senator seeks Bush’s help controlling supplemental spending

Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, R-Tenn., is pressing the White House to use its muscle -- perhaps by publicly threatening a veto -- to bring down the cost of the Senate's $106.5 billion fiscal 2006 supplemental spending bill for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and hurricane relief, according to congressional aides.

The price tag is $14.3 billion above President Bush's request, and Frist has urged Bush to "take a more public role next week" when the measure comes to the Senate floor, a top aide said Tuesday. Frist -- a likely 2008 White House contender -- needs the support of the conservative base, which has been inflamed by the size of the bill approved by the Appropriations Committee earlier this month.

Frist has not specifically recommended a veto threat to the White House, but Republican aides confirmed there have been high-level discussions with the administration and that Frist's office has urged rank-and-file senators to encourage the White House to issue a veto threat.

"Leadership is very concerned we'll have another 'bridge-to-nowhere' debate," said one GOP aide, referring to the brouhaha over spending priorities in last year's highway bill. House Republicans are expected to try to strip the additional funding once the package goes to conference.

Conservative opposition -- along with a Democratic strategy to use the debate to dramatize election-year issues -- is likely to extend debate on the emergency supplemental another week, a Frist aide said Tuesday. "This is going to take longer than people think," said the aide. "We need an extra week."

Frist and other conservatives want more time to debate the issue, arguing the extra spending could further alienate their GOP base. "The Republican base is demoralized and the last thing the Senate should do is say it's more important to secure a railroad crossing in Biloxi rather than fund Humvee patrols in Baghdad," a spokesman for Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla., said Wednesday.

Coburn is considering drafting more than a dozen amendments to challenge non-emergency spending in the supplemental bill like a provision added by Senate Appropriations Chairman Thad Cochran and Sen. Trent Lott, both Mississippi Republicans, to relocate a Gulf Coast rail line.

Conservatives have focused their anger on nearly $4 billion in drought relief for farmers and ranchers, $1.1 billion for Gulf Coast fisheries, and other items totaling nearly $10 billion added in committee April 4. A White House official declined comment on a possible veto threat but noted the administration was "astonished" by the amount of add-ons in the Senate Appropriations Committee and will "continue to work to pass a more fiscally responsible" bill.

Cochran's staff could not be reached for comment by presstime. Cochran said during the markup that Congress should "consider very carefully a bill of this magnitude."

Democrats plan to offer several amendments to highlight the Bush administration's level of funding for health care, veterans' benefits, energy and national security. A protracted debate on the emergency supplemental might delay Senate action on other GOP priorities for May, including Frist's plans to repeal the estate tax and a week dedicated to healthcare bills.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.