Senate subcommittee backs 3.1 percent civilian pay increase

A Senate appropriations subcommittee approved a 3.1 percent average pay raise for federal civilian employees Tuesday, following the House's lead.

The Senate Appropriations Subcommittee for Transportation, Treasury, Housing and Urban Development moved to put the civilian raise on par with military personnel for fiscal 2006. On July 1, the House passed its version of the fiscal 2006 Transportation-Treasury appropriations bill (H.R. 3058), which included the 3.1 percent raise.

Two senators also offered language that would require agencies to allow employee teams to compete in any public-private contest involving more than 10 positions.

The Bush administration had proposed a 2.3 percent pay increase for civilians in 2006, and the White House threatened to veto the House-passed bill. However, Office of Management and Budget deputy director Clay Johnson conceded Tuesday that "Congress seems to be lining up behind 3.1 percent" despite administration opposition.

In order for the pay raise to go through, the Senate must still pass the bill. Then members from the House and Senate will have to work out differences in the two versions of the bill. Once the committee reaches agreement, each chamber must pass a final version. President Bush must then sign the bill into law.

The American Federation of Government Employees and the National Treasury Employees Union released statements expressing support for the subcommittee's decision.

"This action clearly demonstrates the ongoing and growing understanding by members of the Senate of the key role that federal employees daily play in doing the work of the federal government," NTEU President Colleen Kelley said.

The White House put out a policy statement the day before the House passed its bill arguing that by applying the raise across government, Congress would limit the Defense and Homeland Security departments' ability to "design and implement a modern personnel and pay system that best fits their needs."

Sens. Barbara Mikulski, D-Md., and Kit Bond, R-Mo., chairman of the subcommittee, incorporated language into the bill that would require agencies across the government to let employees form teams and compete for their jobs in any public-private competition involving more than 10 positions. Agencies currently only have to allow in-house employees to compete in contests encompassing more than 65 full-time jobs.

The language also affords the in-house teams a 10 percent or $10 million cost advantage in any contest involving more than 10 jobs. The advantage is designed to account for the expected difference in administrative costs, should the work remain in house. Circular A-76, OMB's rule book on public-private job competitions, only requires the cost adjustment in larger competitions.

"This language is the first step in leveling the playing field for federal employees," Mikulski said in a statement. "Our federal employees are on the front lines every day, working hard for America. These hardworking men and women deserve to be treated fairly and, at the very least, deserve to have the same rights that contractors do."

John Gage, president of AFGE, was quick to praise the language. "No one can deny that the Bond-Mikulski reform package is all about promoting competition for the American people and producing savings for the taxpayers."

Bond and Mikulski added the language to the base Senate version of the bill, rather than introducing it as an amendment.

The House version of the Transportation-Treasury bill also contains union-backed language that would affect the Bush administration's competitive sourcing initiative. That language would block agencies from using fiscal 2006 money to run contests under the most recent version of Circular A-76, written in May 2003.

The House and Senate language will be reconciled in conference negotiations. In past appropriations cycles, the Bush administration has succeeded at eliminating similar language from the spending bills during conference.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
FROM OUR SPONSORS
JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Close [ x ] More from GovExec
 
 

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

    Download
  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

    Download
  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

    Download
  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

    Download
  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

    Download
  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

    Download
  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security

    Download

When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.