Pentagon urged to put executive in charge of financial overhaul

David Walker, head of the Government Accountability Office, said the Defense Department should create a new top management position whose responsibilities would include overhauling the agency's financial management systems.

At a hearing Thursday, the Senate Armed Services Committee questioned comptrollers from the armed services on why they continue to be plagued by financial management problems, and looked to Walker for guidance.

Sen. John Ensign, R-Nev., said it was "unacceptable" that pay delays and inventory mismanagement continue. He said he was tired of hearing that changes are under way with no signs of improvement. "Promises are not being kept," he said.

While conveying gratitude for troops serving abroad, the comptrollers assured the committee that they were putting much time and energy into implementing new systems and that they expected visible improvements over the next several years.

Defense, which is on the GAO's list of areas vulnerable to fraud, waste and abuse in nine areas, has gone through several unsuccessful reforms over the past 20 years. In his testimony, Walker noted that "DoD's financial management deficiencies, taken together, continue to represent the single largest obstacle to achieving an unqualified (clean) audit opinion on the U.S. government's consolidated financial statements." He added that he did not see a clear plan in place and that DoD's goal of having a clean audit by 2007 was unrealistic.

Walker said that though he believed agency leaders were committed to cleaning up financial systems, he recommended creating a new position of chief operating officer or chief management official. That individual would be charged with straightening out the agency's financial management systems.

Ensign said that the person should not be a policy expert or partisan, but rather strictly focused on operational aspects of the agency.

Walker declined to specify a date by which he believes Defense will be able to receive a clean audit because he said he cannot make such an estimate until he sees a plan in place. He said that it would take a top-level executive--the kind of person he recommended for the job--five to seven years.

Tina Jonas, undersecretary of defense, agreed that getting a clean audit may take longer than the current 2007 target. She said she was not at Defense when that date was chosen.

Valerie Lynn Baldwin, assistant secretary of the Army, said one reason soldiers are not getting paid on time is because the Army uses two separate systems for pay and entitlements, and the two systems don't "talk to each other." If a solder is mobilized from Kuwait to Iraq, she said, that soldier may not receive the higher pay he is due because the information is not transferred to the pay system.

In fact, she said, 31 percent of Army staffers, including the Army chief of staff, have experienced delays in paychecks, and "we don't know why." New software, she said, should help.

Walker noted the challenges of having so many distinct organizations within Defense, saying: "There are too many layers, too many players, and too many systems."

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.