TSA revamps annual screener recertification tests

The Transportation Security Administration is testing and recertifying its workforce of about 45,000 airport passenger and baggage screeners.

The second annual screener recertification program began last month and will run through June 2005, according to Peter Marcello, TSA's recertification program manager. Under the program, screeners must prove their proficiency using X-ray and explosive detection machines, and perform a physical demonstration of passenger and baggage screening skills.

The agency spent months retooling the recertification program to avoid problems that plagued the first annual tests, which wrapped up in May, said Elizabeth Kolmstetter, TSA's acting assistant administrator for workforce performance and training.

Screeners have two chances to pass the recertification tests. Marcello and Kolmstetter said 99 percent of all screeners passed the first annual recertification tests. But many screeners did not pass until their second chance, causing TSA to realize discrepancies within the testing regime.

Government Executive first reported problems with the program, especially that screeners were being tested using different standard operating procedures, which Marcello and Kolmstetter acknowledged.

In an effort to standardize testing, TSA surveyed all federal security directors and training coordinators and sent teams to 21 airports across the country to interview screeners, supervisors and managers, Kolmstetter said.

"We put a lot of effort into this," Kolmstetter said. "We recognize that the changes in the SOPs, regardless of recertification, are causing [concerns]."

The agency also brought 40 employees to headquarters in Washington for a two-day work session focused on improving the testing program, Marcello added.

Kolmstetter said a big challenge for the testing program was that SOPs regularly change based on new threats and intelligence. In response, the recertification program this year allows screeners to pass tests in some cases using different SOPs. For example, TSA revised SOPs last month after two passenger airplanes in Russia were simultaneously blown up. Until Nov. 1, screeners can pass recertification tests by demonstrating proficiency on either new SOPs or previously accepted standards.

"In some cases, we accept two answers to one question," Marcello said.

TSA also renewed a contract with Lockheed Martin for $20 million to conduct the physical evaluation of screeners' passenger and baggage testing skills. Lockheed Martin evaluators also received additional training on SOPs.

Kolmstetter said TSA is pleased with how Lockheed Martin has carried out its recertification contract.

Still, some airport screeners remain skeptical about the testing program this time around.

The Metropolitan Airport Workers Association in New York City is concerned the tests might discriminate against workers with medical disabilities, said MAWA director of administration, Bob Marchetta. For example, MAWA is worried the tests might not be adjusted to accommodate workers with physical disabilities, causing them to fail and possibly be fired. Therefore, the organization is considering filing a complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission over the tests, Marchetta said.

"If we think you're breaking the law, we have a right to ask you to prove that you're not," he said.

Ron Massey, a screener at Lansing Capital City Airport in Michigan, failed the recertification tests on both tries when he took them two weeks ago. He is now on administrative leave with pay, but faces losing his job. He said he was not told why he failed the tests on his first try.

"The problem that I have with the tests is they don't give you any results to let you know what to study," he said. "If I'm studying, you need to show me what I'm deficient in so I can make it work."

Kolmstetter and Marcello said screeners were not briefed on their test results so there would be no accusations of "training to the test."

Instead, screeners who fail the first round of tests are given a minimum of four hours of remedial training before they try again. "We have a very high second-time pass rate," Kolmstetter added.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
FROM OUR SPONSORS
JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Close [ x ] More from GovExec
 
 

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Going Agile:Revolutionizing Federal Digital Services Delivery

    Here’s one indication that times have changed: Harriet Tubman is going to be the next face of the twenty dollar bill. Another sign of change? The way in which the federal government arrived at that decision.

    View
  • Cyber Risk Report: Cybercrime Trends from 2016

    In our first half 2016 cyber trends report, SurfWatch Labs threat intelligence analysts noted one key theme – the interconnected nature of cybercrime – and the second half of the year saw organizations continuing to struggle with that reality. The number of potential cyber threats, the pool of already compromised information, and the ease of finding increasingly sophisticated cybercriminal tools continued to snowball throughout the year.

    View
  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

    View
  • GBC Issue Brief: The Future of 9-1-1

    A Look Into the Next Generation of Emergency Services

    View
  • GBC Survey Report: Securing the Perimeters

    A candid survey on cybersecurity in state and local governments

    View
  • The New IP: Moving Government Agencies Toward the Network of The Future

    Federal IT managers are looking to modernize legacy network infrastructures that are taxed by growing demands from mobile devices, video, vast amounts of data, and more. This issue brief discusses the federal government network landscape, as well as market, financial force drivers for network modernization.

    View
  • eBook: State & Local Cybersecurity

    CenturyLink is committed to helping state and local governments meet their cybersecurity challenges. Towards that end, CenturyLink commissioned a study from the Government Business Council that looked at the perceptions, attitudes and experiences of state and local leaders around the cybersecurity issue. The results were surprising in a number of ways. Learn more about their findings and the ways in which state and local governments can combat cybersecurity threats with this eBook.

    View

When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.