House panel approves supplemental without AmeriCorps funding
- By Peter Cohn and Lisa Caruso
- July 22, 2003
- Comments
VA-HUD Appropriations Subcommittee ranking member Alan Mollohan, D-W.Va., voted with Republicans against the AmeriCorps amendment.
As approved, the supplemental is about $100 million more than the administration's $1.9 billion request, and includes an extra $30 million for ongoing forest firefighting efforts over the $189 million request.
It also contains $32 million to cover expenses incurred by the federal judiciary related to additional district judgeships and an anticipated shortfall in attorney payments and fees for civil jurors, as well as $60 million for Army Corps of Engineers flood control efforts, both of which were not requested by the White House.
The measure contains $1.55 billion for Federal Emergency Management Agency disaster relief efforts and $50 million for recovery expenses related to the space shuttle Columbia accident, as requested by the administration.
The Senate version of the supplemental, also worth $2 billion, is essentially the administration's request plus the additional $100 million for AmeriCorps, setting up a potentially difficult conference this week over the fiscal 2004 Legislative Branch funding measure, in which the Senate supplemental bill is included. House Appropriations Chairman Bill Young, R-Fla., said Monday he aimed to complete the conference this week.
House Appropriations ranking member David Obey, D-Wis., also offered an amendment to the House version of the supplemental that would have provided $50 million for the Transportation Security Administration to prevent the agency from making cuts in its sky marshal program. The amendment lost on a 32-21 vote.
In other action Monday, the House panel approved a $90 billion VA-HUD spending bill by voice vote after striking a provision supported by the administration that would have established a $250 enrollment fee and increased co-payments for prescription drugs from $7 to $15 for a 30-day supply for veterans whose illnesses are not service-connected or who make more than $24,000 annually.
The amendment by Rep. Virgil Goode, R-Va., passed on a voice vote and would offset the $264 million cost of reinstating the benefit by taking the funds from Veterans Affairs Department administrative expenses.
An earlier version of the amendment by Rep. Chet Edwards, D-Texas, would have offset the enrollment fee elimination by reducing the 2001 tax cut.
The House may consider the VA-HUD bill this week, Young said.
Meanwhile, the Senate took up a $28.5 billion 2004 Homeland Security spending bill Monday, which Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, R-Tenn., said he aims to complete this week.
Appropriations ranking member Robert Byrd, D-W.Va., offered an amendment to add almost $1.8 billion in funds for first responders and border, port, transit, air cargo and chemical facility security.
The House was expected to take up a $17.1 billion 2004 Foreign Operations bill Tuesday.
By using this service you agree not to post material that is obscene, harassing, defamatory, or otherwise objectionable. Although GovExec.com does not monitor comments posted to this site (and has no obligation to), it reserves the right to delete, edit, or move any material that it deems to be in violation of this rule.
No USDA Furloughs
Is It Too Hard to Fire Misbehaving Feds?
Americans Still Like the Postal Service
Making Government 'Simpler'
No More Tax-Cheating Feds, Senators Say
Video: The Daily Show on Apple's Taxes
Cutting costs: Inside the effort to improve the efficiency of federal operations
Sponsored
3 Ways Data is Improving DoD Performance
Research Report: Powering Continuous Monitoring Through Big Data
Need to Know Memo: Big Data
