House panel approves fiscal 2004 Labor-HHS approps bill

Preferring to voice their objections rather than amend a bill they oppose, Democratic members of the House Labor-HHS Appropriations Subcommittee Thursday highlighted what they see as deficiencies in the $138 billion fiscal 2004 Labor-HHS appropriations bill the panel reported out on a 11-7 party-line vote.

Appropriations ranking member David Obey, D-Wis., led the charge, saying that Democrats wanted people "to see clearly what this bill does as a consequence of [the Republican-led Congress'] tax-cutting binge." Obey added that it was only fitting that the subcommittee was voting on the fiscal 2004 Labor-HHS spending bill one day after the House "voted to use up $800 million" to repeal the estate tax, a move "that cost us critical reductions in programs [in the Labor-HHS bill] that help working families. We're stiffing an awful lot of good people today."

The bill, which represents a roughly 3 percent increase over the fiscal 2003 level of $132.4 billion, will go to full-committee markup Wednesday. The $138 billion bill also provides a small increase over the president's fiscal 2004 budget request of $137.99 billion. Labor-HHS Appropriations Subcommittee Chairman Ralph Regula, R-Ohio, called the measure a "well-balanced bill," adding, "We've done the best we could with the hand that was dealt us." But Minority Whip Steny Hoyer, D-Md., said: "Our side does not agree with the trade-offs you've made. ... You're cutting our ability to collectively take care of our country."

Obey and Reps. Nita Lowey, D-N.Y., and Rosa DeLauro, D-Conn., ran down the litany of program cuts and funding shortfalls to which they objected. Those included: $8 billion less for No Child Left Behind than authorized by law; Title I funding for the disadvantaged, $334 million short of what was promised in the fiscal 2004 budget resolution; $1.2 billion less than promised in the budget resolution for special education; a freeze in the maximum Pell grant; a 2.5 percent increase over last year for the National Institutes of Health, compared to last year's 15 percent increase over fiscal 2002; a $150.8 million cut from last year's level for community service block grants; and $200 million less than the president requested for the Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program.

Meanwhile, the House Legislative Branch Appropriations Subcommittee Thursday approved a $2.7 billion fiscal 2004 spending bill under which all legislative agencies will get less money next year-but no staff positions will be cut and cost-of-living and other pay-related cost increases will be fully funded.

The $2.7 billion bill, to which Senate spending will be added later, is $34 million less than enacted in fiscal 2003, a drop of 1.2 percent. It is 10 percent and $290 million lower than the budget request. The measure has wide bipartisan support and passed on a voice vote.

The Capitol Police will not get any more officers, but remain at the current staff level of 1,895. That is an increase of 512 positions since the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, but the committee was wary of further growth in the force without a better evaluation of how many officers are needed. In response to growing concern about costs for the Capitol Visitors Center, the bill does not fund any new major construction projects through the architect of the Capitol.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Forecasting Cloud's Future

    Conversations with Federal, State, and Local Technology Leaders on Cloud-Driven Digital Transformation

  • The Big Data Campaign Trail

    With everyone so focused on security following recent breaches at federal, state and local government and education institutions, there has been little emphasis on the need for better operations. This report breaks down some of the biggest operational challenges in IT management and provides insight into how agencies and leaders can successfully solve some of the biggest lingering government IT issues.

  • Communicating Innovation in Federal Government

    Federal Government spending on ‘obsolete technology’ continues to increase. Supporting the twin pillars of improved digital service delivery for citizens on the one hand, and the increasingly optimized and flexible working practices for federal employees on the other, are neither easy nor inexpensive tasks. This whitepaper explores how federal agencies can leverage the value of existing agency technology assets while offering IT leaders the ability to implement the kind of employee productivity, citizen service improvements and security demanded by federal oversight.

  • IT Transformation Trends: Flash Storage as a Strategic IT Asset

    MIT Technology Review: Flash Storage As a Strategic IT Asset For the first time in decades, IT leaders now consider all-flash storage as a strategic IT asset. IT has become a new operating model that enables self-service with high performance, density and resiliency. It also offers the self-service agility of the public cloud combined with the security, performance, and cost-effectiveness of a private cloud. Download this MIT Technology Review paper to learn more about how all-flash storage is transforming the data center.

  • Ongoing Efforts in Veterans Health Care Modernization

    This report discusses the current state of veterans health care


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.