House heads for vote on fiscal 2002 supplemental appropriations

House GOP leaders, intent late Tuesday on taking the fiscal 2002 supplemental spending bill to the floor Wednesday, were crafting a rule designed to secure the necessary 218 Republican votes to move the process forward.

During a Tuesday afternoon GOP Conference meeting, House Speaker Dennis Hastert, R-Ill., insisted the House would not break for the Memorial Day recess until it had passed the supplemental. Before the conference, Hastert told reporters he hoped to consider the $29.4 billion package Wednesday. "We'll try to get it done [Wednesday] or Thursday or Friday or Saturday or Sunday," Hastert said.

Although the rule had not been filed at presstime, leadership sources said key decisions had been made to ensure the support of restive conservatives. At the same time, appropriators did not explicitly say the compromise would lose their support. At the behest of conservatives, House leaders promised the rule would provide an offset to pay for the $250 million added to the bill in committee for aid to Israel and the Palestinians.

Leaders also committed themselves to including a so-called "deeming" resolution to set the fiscal 2003 discretionary spending limit at the $759 billion level set in the House-passed budget resolution, despite pressure from appropriators to go to $768 billion.

And GOP leaders rebuffed entreaties by Democrats-and appropriators-to allow an up-or-down vote on raising the debt limit. Instead, the rule will add language to the bill declaring Congress' commitment to protecting the full faith and credit of the federal government. Such "placeholder" language, according to GOP sources in both chambers, will allow conferees to insert statutory provisions later to raise the debt ceiling in conference with the Senate.

At Tuesday's Rules Committee hearing, Appropriations Chairman C.W. (Bill) Young, R-Fla., reiterated his opposition to using the supplemental to carry other items-but stopped short of saying that strategy would prompt a "no" vote from him.

"Does that mean I'll vote against the rule? Not necessarily," Young said. When pressed by committee Democrats if he would support the rule, Young would only say: "I want to see the rule. When I see the rule, I'll let you know."

The rule was not expected to protect from points of order the two amendments adopted in committee concerning the release of $34 million in fiscal 2002 money for United Nations population efforts. Nor was it expected to protect language to divert money from the Highway Trust Fund to cover various transportation-related spending provisions.

House Ways and Means Chairman Bill Thomas, R-Calif., had hoped it would include language clarifying the administration's authority to fix a glitch in the Medicare physician payment formula. But that effort evaporated after the Congressional Budget Office estimated it would cost $43 billion over 10 years.

The rule also was expected to address the promise by GOP leaders to Rep. Jim DeMint, R-S.C., for language on textiles that was the basis for his vote for presidential trade negotiating authority last fall.

At presstime, it was unclear whether the rule would include other Medicare changes. One would change the date by which private health plans must inform Medicare if they intend to remain in the program for the next year. It also would delay by one year the "lock-in" rule that limits how often beneficiaries may change plans.

The rule could include changes that would boost Medicare payments for hospitals in some individual members' districts.

Mark Wegner and Julie Rovner contributed to this story.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Forecasting Cloud's Future

    Conversations with Federal, State, and Local Technology Leaders on Cloud-Driven Digital Transformation

  • The Big Data Campaign Trail

    With everyone so focused on security following recent breaches at federal, state and local government and education institutions, there has been little emphasis on the need for better operations. This report breaks down some of the biggest operational challenges in IT management and provides insight into how agencies and leaders can successfully solve some of the biggest lingering government IT issues.

  • Communicating Innovation in Federal Government

    Federal Government spending on ‘obsolete technology’ continues to increase. Supporting the twin pillars of improved digital service delivery for citizens on the one hand, and the increasingly optimized and flexible working practices for federal employees on the other, are neither easy nor inexpensive tasks. This whitepaper explores how federal agencies can leverage the value of existing agency technology assets while offering IT leaders the ability to implement the kind of employee productivity, citizen service improvements and security demanded by federal oversight.

  • IT Transformation Trends: Flash Storage as a Strategic IT Asset

    MIT Technology Review: Flash Storage As a Strategic IT Asset For the first time in decades, IT leaders now consider all-flash storage as a strategic IT asset. IT has become a new operating model that enables self-service with high performance, density and resiliency. It also offers the self-service agility of the public cloud combined with the security, performance, and cost-effectiveness of a private cloud. Download this MIT Technology Review paper to learn more about how all-flash storage is transforming the data center.

  • Ongoing Efforts in Veterans Health Care Modernization

    This report discusses the current state of veterans health care


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.