House Democrats unlikely to offer their own budget plan

As next Wednesday's House floor debate on the fiscal 2003 budget approaches, Democrats appear to have decided to train their fire on the Republican-sponsored budget rather than offer alternatives of their own.

Although they have yet to make the final call, both Minority Leader Dick Gephardt, D-Mo., and a Blue Dog Coalition leader, Rep. Jim Turner, D-Texas, indicated Thursday that neither the fiscally conservative Blue Dogs nor the party leadership is likely to present a full-blown budget plan.

However, an aide to the Blue Dogs' leading budget expert--Rep. Charles Stenholm, D-Texas--said Stenholm and other moderate Democrats may draft a budget to put on the floor.

Gephardt said the party is united in its critique of Republicans' $2.1 trillion budget, which would run an on-budget, or non-Social Security, deficit of $224 billion next year, and $830 billion over five years.

"We think the Republican budget in the House is a failure, an absolute and total failure in dealing with the big problems that America faces," Gephardt said in renewing his call for a budget summit with the White House rather than repeat the annual exercise of offering alternative budgets that will lose on the House floor.

A senior House Democratic aide added: "We're in a straitjacket. The decisions were really made last year, and are still being played out this year and for years to come. This is pretty much a continuation budget" that Republicans have crafted in the wake of last year's $1.35 trillion tax cut.

The aide even quoted former Speaker Gingrich, who in May 1990--while serving as GOP whip--said it is not the responsibility of the minority party to offer a budget plan.

Turner, a Blue Dog co-chairman, said his group is unlikely to offer an alternative either, opting instead to lend its voice to Democratic opposition to the GOP budget.

"It's a question of trying to unify the Democratic Caucus around an issue that represents the linchpin of fiscal discipline. And that linchpin is Social Security," he said. Turner reiterated the importance of having "the Democratic Caucus speak with one voice."

An aide to Stenholm said the Blue Dog leader is still interested in offering a budget and is talking with moderate Democrats about it. The aide said Democrats have much less flexibility than they did last year in trying to write a fiscally responsible budget that maintains Democratic priorities without touching the Social Security surplus or using more optimistic OMB numbers.

"The options are much more limited" this year, the aide said. "Last year Republicans locked in all of their priorities with their budget."

For its part, the Congressional Progressive Caucus, which presented its own substitute last year, plans to offer an amendment to the GOP's budget that would freeze $300 billion of last year's tax cut and spend it on a prescription drug plan authored by Rep. Bernard Sanders, I-Vt., while also calling on the drug industry to voluntarily cut drug prices for further savings.

According to a spokeswoman for Rep. Dennis Kucinich, D-Ohio, chairman of the Progressive Caucus, the "prescription for America" amendment would freeze implementation of the tax cut for the top 1 percent of income earners.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.