Senate panel backs Bush nominee for regulatory review post
- May 24, 2001
- Comments
Sens. Joseph Lieberman, D-Conn., Richard Durbin, D-Ill. and Robert Torricelli, D-N.J., voted against Graham, whose emphasis on employing a cost-benefit analysis on regulation has been sharply criticized by environmental and consumer groups.
If approved by the full Senate, Graham would become administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, the section of OMB responsible for reviewing new federal regulations.
The Natural Resources Defense Council denounced Graham as a "nightmare choice" who would favor business interests over environmental concerns and public health.
"It's doubtful he would be an even-handed judge of regulatory costs," NRDC's Wesley Warren said.
Durbin and Lieberman also questioned Graham's ability to set aside what they described as a bias against federal regulations revealed by Graham's statements as director of the Harvard Center for Risk Analysis.
By using this service you agree not to post material that is obscene, harassing, defamatory, or otherwise objectionable. Although GovExec.com does not monitor comments posted to this site (and has no obligation to), it reserves the right to delete, edit, or move any material that it deems to be in violation of this rule.
'Back-Door' Base Closures
Biden Talks Loss With Fallen Troops' Families
Neely Out at GSA
More USPS Buyouts
Gimme My Discount! Deals for Feds
Buyout Watch: Who's Offering What
