Senate votes for military-civilian pay parity

The Senate on Friday voted for a fiscal 2002 budget resolution that assumes an average 4.6 percent civilian and military pay raise for next year.

The Bush budget blueprint, released in early March, proposed a 4.6 percent military pay raise, but it did not include a figure for a pay raise for civilian federal employees. The Office of Management and Budget told agencies to assume an average 3.6 percent increase next year in their budget planning.

Some lawmakers, concerned that federal workers would not get the same raise as military personnel for the first time since 1987, made sure the House and Senate budget resolutions included pay parity. Last week, the House passed a budget resolution that calls for military-civilian pay parity, with a 4.6 percent average raise for all.

"We have assumed that the historic pay parity between civilian and military employees will be maintained, and that the President's proposed 4.6 percent raise for military personnel will be similarly provided to all federal workers next year," Senate Budget Committee Chairman Pete Domenici, R-N.M., said on the Senate floor Wednesday.

Sen. Paul Sarbanes, D-Md., praised Domenici for supporting military-civilian pay parity. "In many instances federal civilian and military employees work side-by-side doing the important work of the nation, and Congress has recognized that we should not undermine the morale of these dedicated public servants by failing to bring them in line with military personnel," he said.

Fifteen Senate Democrats voted with all 50 of the evenly divided chamber's Republicans for the fiscal 2002 budget resolution that cuts President Bush's $1.6 trillion tax cut over 10 years down to just under $1.3 trillion. The vote came after a last-ditch lobbying effort by Republican leaders and the Bush administration failed to boost the tax cut any higher.

After Thursday night's interparty trench warfare over the size of the tax cut, it stood at $1.289 trillion, according to the majority staff director of the Senate Budget Committee.

Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott, R-Miss., and Senate Minority Leader Tom Daschle, D-S.D., both declined to offer "wrap-up" amendments. For Lott, it was an acknowledgement that he could not keep his GOP Conference behind a larger tax cut. Said Republican Conference Chairman Rick Santorum of Pennsylvania, "I think everybody just decided to do a cease fire," but he praised the "strong vote" behind a nearly $1.3 trillion tax cut. Senate Majority Whip Nickles said, "Some of us wanted a little more than that, but that's where the votes were." White House Press Secretary Ari Fleischer on Friday indicated the White House no longer expects to obtain Bush's entire $1.6 trillion tax cut, but he had expressed hope the Senate would move more toward the president's number.

Fleischer pointed to the House-Senate conference on the budget resolution as an opportunity for Bush to get more in tax relief, noting that the House has already voted for the entire $1.6 trillion plan. The administration will issue a detailed budget plan on Monday that will include an official endorsement of a pay raise figure for federal workers.

With reporting by Lisa Caruso, CongressDaily, and Katy Saldarini.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.