USDA settles six-year-old discrimination lawsuit

The U.S. Department of Agriculture last week settled a six-year-old sexual harassment class action lawsuit in federal court in Oakland, Calif. The settlement allows more than 5,800 former and current female employees to file individual suits for alleged offenses dating back to 1994. The settled case was sparked by an earlier class action that dated from 1973, in which female employees sued the Forest Service in California for discrimination in hiring and promotion decisions. A 1981 consent decree settled that case, and the terms of that decree were to remain in effect until 1986. But in December 1995, Forest Service employees Ginelle O'Connor and Lesa Donnelly sued Agriculture for subjecting them and other female employees to gender-based discrimination, alleging that the earlier class action invited backlash from male co-workers. Some of the abuse included physical assaults, rape threats and stalking. "At that time all I was asking for was a letter of apology," Donnelly said about her initial sexual harassment case. But when she received calls from other women claiming harassment, she took her complaints to the regional office, "thinking that they are going to want to hear that these woman are being harassed like this," she said. Instead, officials from the regional office threatened to fire her for conspiring against them, gave her bad performance ratings and placed her under investigation for misconduct, Donnelly said. By 1996, the reprisals increased to the point where "the agency took all my duties away and I had no job from 1996 to 2000," Donnelly said. Donnelly's case, which started with 50 women in 1995, was certified as a class action suit in March 1997 with more than 500 women. "They were just chased out of their jobs," Donnelly said. "And all during that time [Agriculture officials] said this is just your agenda, Lesa, these things aren't really happening." Under the settlement, Agriculture agreed to require the Forest Service in California to put in place special civil rights enforcement programs and personnel training. It also requires the agency to set up an Equal Employment Opportunity processing unit to investigate and resolve sexual harassment and hostile environment claims. For Donnelly, as long as women continue to be harassed, the fight isn't over. "I'm hoping we'll be able to institutionalize these things so that if women do come forward, management will take action, and the perpetrators will be held accountable," Donnelly said. Lawrence Lucas, president of the USDA Coalition of Minority Employees, said the settlement is "a stunning victory for those women…who have fought so hard for civil rights in the USDA." In recent years, Agriculture has been the subject of several class action lawsuits filed by farmers and department employees alleging discrimination against African Americans. Lucas lamented the waste of taxpayer resources used to settle the Donnelly case, which he said might have been resolved long ago with a written apology. "What the government should be doing in lieu of having these long protracted lawsuits, is working diligently to resolve all of these class actions lawsuits at the lowest level and resolve them so that the taxpayers will not have to bear the burden," Lucas said. In October, former Agriculture Secretary Dan Glickman hired three firms to go into field offices and review office operations, interview witnesses, determine why complaints persist and identify factors that contribute to discrimination at the agency. "This settlement should be a signal for the new [Bush] administration to not make the mistakes of the last [presidential administration] and make sure that civil rights are a priority and are taken more seriously in 2001 and beyond," Lucas said.
Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
FROM OUR SPONSORS
JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Close [ x ] More from GovExec
 
 

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Forecasting Cloud's Future

    Conversations with Federal, State, and Local Technology Leaders on Cloud-Driven Digital Transformation

    Download
  • The Big Data Campaign Trail

    With everyone so focused on security following recent breaches at federal, state and local government and education institutions, there has been little emphasis on the need for better operations. This report breaks down some of the biggest operational challenges in IT management and provides insight into how agencies and leaders can successfully solve some of the biggest lingering government IT issues.

    Download
  • Communicating Innovation in Federal Government

    Federal Government spending on ‘obsolete technology’ continues to increase. Supporting the twin pillars of improved digital service delivery for citizens on the one hand, and the increasingly optimized and flexible working practices for federal employees on the other, are neither easy nor inexpensive tasks. This whitepaper explores how federal agencies can leverage the value of existing agency technology assets while offering IT leaders the ability to implement the kind of employee productivity, citizen service improvements and security demanded by federal oversight.

    Download
  • IT Transformation Trends: Flash Storage as a Strategic IT Asset

    MIT Technology Review: Flash Storage As a Strategic IT Asset For the first time in decades, IT leaders now consider all-flash storage as a strategic IT asset. IT has become a new operating model that enables self-service with high performance, density and resiliency. It also offers the self-service agility of the public cloud combined with the security, performance, and cost-effectiveness of a private cloud. Download this MIT Technology Review paper to learn more about how all-flash storage is transforming the data center.

    Download
  • Ongoing Efforts in Veterans Health Care Modernization

    This report discusses the current state of veterans health care

    Download

When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.