Agencies receive lackluster grades on performance reports

Most agencies' fiscal 1999 performance reports fail to explain how well they are accomplishing their missions, according to a new round of grades released by Sen. Fred Thompson, R-Tenn.

Agencies' reports were graded on how well they explained and delivered on their performance results, progress made in solving major management problems, and agency accomplishments. Each agency was graded on how many key goals relating to its mission it accomplished.

Of the 24 largest agencies, only four-the Departments of Transportation, Veterans Affairs, Education, and the Social Security Administration-received grades higher than a 'C'.

The Departments of Commerce, Energy, Justice, and State all flunked.

"These performance reports are supposed to inform Congress and the public about what agencies are doing and how well they are doing it. Most of them don't do that," said Thompson, chairman of the Senate Governmental Affairs Committee. "Unfortunately, in many cases, agencies didn't have goals for things that we assumed were in their primary mission."

Thompson's commmittee found that agencies have particular difficulty preventing fraud and waste in the use of taxpayer dollars and in providing quality customer service to the public.

The performance reports mark the culmination of the first complete cycle of the Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA), a 1993 law requiring agencies to write strategic plans and prepare annual performance plans and performance reports. Agencies submitted their first performance reports in March, assessing how well they met their goals in fiscal 1999.

Thompson's grades were based on reviews of agencies' fiscal 1999 performance reports by the Mercatus Center at George Mason University, the General Accounting Office, the Congressional Research Service, Senate Governmental Affairs Committee staff, and agency inspectors general.

Agencies' 1999 performance reports were also graded in May by Mercatus Center scholars, but the focus of those grades was on how agencies delivered their information-readability and user-friendliness of the reports.

Governmental Affairs Committee's Grades of Agencies' 1999 Annual Performance Reports

Agency Grade
Transportation A
Veterans Affairs A
Education B
SSA B
HUD C
Interior C
Labor C
NSF C
DoD C-
EPA C-
FEMA C-
GSA C-
HHS C-
NASA C-
NRC C-
Treasury C-
USAID C-
USDA D
OPM D
SBA D
Commerce F
Energy F
Justice F
State F
Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
FROM OUR SPONSORS
JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Close [ x ] More from GovExec
 
 

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Forecasting Cloud's Future

    Conversations with Federal, State, and Local Technology Leaders on Cloud-Driven Digital Transformation

    Download
  • The Big Data Campaign Trail

    With everyone so focused on security following recent breaches at federal, state and local government and education institutions, there has been little emphasis on the need for better operations. This report breaks down some of the biggest operational challenges in IT management and provides insight into how agencies and leaders can successfully solve some of the biggest lingering government IT issues.

    Download
  • Communicating Innovation in Federal Government

    Federal Government spending on ‘obsolete technology’ continues to increase. Supporting the twin pillars of improved digital service delivery for citizens on the one hand, and the increasingly optimized and flexible working practices for federal employees on the other, are neither easy nor inexpensive tasks. This whitepaper explores how federal agencies can leverage the value of existing agency technology assets while offering IT leaders the ability to implement the kind of employee productivity, citizen service improvements and security demanded by federal oversight.

    Download
  • IT Transformation Trends: Flash Storage as a Strategic IT Asset

    MIT Technology Review: Flash Storage As a Strategic IT Asset For the first time in decades, IT leaders now consider all-flash storage as a strategic IT asset. IT has become a new operating model that enables self-service with high performance, density and resiliency. It also offers the self-service agility of the public cloud combined with the security, performance, and cost-effectiveness of a private cloud. Download this MIT Technology Review paper to learn more about how all-flash storage is transforming the data center.

    Download
  • Ongoing Efforts in Veterans Health Care Modernization

    This report discusses the current state of veterans health care

    Download

When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.