GOP leaders reject White House ergonomics proposal

House and Senate GOP leaders on Monday rejected a Clinton administration proposal to delay the date the Occupational Safety and Health Administration could implement a new rule providing ergonomics protections for workers, according to congressional sources.

Disagreement over the ergonomics rule was a primary reason the Republican leadership rejected a deal reached very early Monday morning between appropriators and the administration on the Labor-Health and Human Services-Education appropriations bill.

The compromise would have kept the controversial, long-delayed rules from going into effect until June, but would have permitted them to be published as final rules before the new administration takes office in January, sources said.

Since the deal fell through, the original amendment blocking the publication of the workplace ergonomics rule appears to be still in the Labor-HHS-Education appropriations bill, H.R. 4577, despite indications by backers last week that they "would not hold up government" over it. The existing amendment would prevent OSHA from publishing or implementing any type of ergonomic protection for workers.

House Majority Whip Tom DeLay, R-Texas, said the Labor-HHS-Education spending package "needs some work," while House Majority Leader Richard Armey, R-Texas, called it "a bad offer;" both took particular exception to the deal on the administration's controversial workplace ergonomics rule.

While House Appropriations Committee ranking member David Obey, D-Wis., called the ergonomics deal a "basic welching on an agreement" appropriators made last year to stop delaying the rule, House Speaker Dennis Hastert, R-Ill., on Monday countered that the administration's proposal amounted to the status quo. "The status quo isn't satisfactory," he said. GOP leaders, rather than appropriators, now have the responsibility for hammering out final ergonomics language.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
FROM OUR SPONSORS
JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Close [ x ] More from GovExec
 
 

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

    Download
  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

    Download
  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

    Download
  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

    Download
  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

    Download
  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

    Download
  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security

    Download

When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.