EEOC challenges Navy on discrimination complaints

The Navy is making several changes in the second phase of its pilot program for processing discrimination complaints because of concerns raised by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.

According to a Navy study, the pilot program, which started in June 1998, has saved the department more than $34,000 per case. A spokesperson for the Navy Office of Information said the service hopes to eventually replace its traditional EEO system with the new streamlined program.

In June, the EEOC ruled in favor of two Navy employees who had filed appeals against the Navy last year. The employees filed appeals after the pilot program failed to resolve their cases. The commission ordered that both cases go through the traditional EEO complaint process, and told the Navy to suspend the pilot program.

EEOC officials are concerned about confidentiality, fairness and neutrality for cases in the Navy pilot program that fail to reach resolution. If complainants choose to participate in the pilot program, they must waive certain rights: the right to remain anonymous, the right to request a hearing before an EEOC administrative judge, and the right to opt out of the the program.

A spokesperson for the Navy said that phase two of the pilot program will address EEOC concerns and recommendations.

"Phase two addresses the recommendations made by the EEOC and complies with the federal requirements noted by EEOC. Our goal is to press ahead with the pilot and continue to improve upon the success we experienced in phase one," Lt. Jane Alexander said.

According to the EEOC, the pilot program's "opt out" waiver deprives the employee of returning to the traditional process if alternative dispute resolution (ADR) efforts do not resolve the issue. The absence of a hearing also avoids making EEOC judges' decisions binding on the parties.

Alexander said that phase two will give employees the option to abandon their complaint under the pilot process at any time and return to the traditional EEO complaint process, if they so desire.

Last November, the EEOC ordered agencies to establish ADR programs, which are designed to settle disputes outside a courtroom using some form of arbitration or mediation. In the June decision, the EEOC says ADR is intended to work within the traditional EEO system, not replace it.

Both House and Senate versions of the Defense Authorization Act for fiscal 2001 (H.R. 4205 and S. 2550) contain provisions that would authorize the Navy to establish its own ADR program apart from the traditional EEO process. The Clinton administration opposes the provision, saying it would prevent the EEOC from addressing concerns raised by complainants. The two bills are now in conference committee.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Forecasting Cloud's Future

    Conversations with Federal, State, and Local Technology Leaders on Cloud-Driven Digital Transformation

  • The Big Data Campaign Trail

    With everyone so focused on security following recent breaches at federal, state and local government and education institutions, there has been little emphasis on the need for better operations. This report breaks down some of the biggest operational challenges in IT management and provides insight into how agencies and leaders can successfully solve some of the biggest lingering government IT issues.

  • Communicating Innovation in Federal Government

    Federal Government spending on ‘obsolete technology’ continues to increase. Supporting the twin pillars of improved digital service delivery for citizens on the one hand, and the increasingly optimized and flexible working practices for federal employees on the other, are neither easy nor inexpensive tasks. This whitepaper explores how federal agencies can leverage the value of existing agency technology assets while offering IT leaders the ability to implement the kind of employee productivity, citizen service improvements and security demanded by federal oversight.

  • IT Transformation Trends: Flash Storage as a Strategic IT Asset

    MIT Technology Review: Flash Storage As a Strategic IT Asset For the first time in decades, IT leaders now consider all-flash storage as a strategic IT asset. IT has become a new operating model that enables self-service with high performance, density and resiliency. It also offers the self-service agility of the public cloud combined with the security, performance, and cost-effectiveness of a private cloud. Download this MIT Technology Review paper to learn more about how all-flash storage is transforming the data center.

  • Ongoing Efforts in Veterans Health Care Modernization

    This report discusses the current state of veterans health care


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.