Senate bill calls for advisory board on declassification

A special board of advisers on declassifying federal records would improve what has become a costly and time-consuming process for security agencies, according to witnesses at a Senate hearing Wednesday.

The Senate Governmental Affairs Committee heard testimony on S. 1801, the Public Interest Declassification Act of 1999, which calls for a nine-member declassification board to make recommendations to the President on declassification policy and agency programs.

The proposed board would advise the President on whether or not certain information should be released to the public, but would not have the authority to declassify documents.

In 1995, President Clinton issued Executive Order 12958, mandating declassification of historically valuable information that is at least 25 years old.

Committee Chairman Fred Thompson, R-Tenn., said declassification is a delicate balancing act. "It's a question of striking the right balance-of finding a way to release needlessly classified information without preventing our security agencies from accomplishing their missions or letting sensitive information escape," Thompson said.

According to a 1998 report from the Information Security Oversight Office , 850 million pages were declassified under various review programs between 1980 and 1998. The bulk of that material was released after the President's 1995 executive order.

The bill's sponsor, Sen. Daniel Patrick Moynihan, D-N.Y., introduced similar legislation in 1997, along with Sen. Jesse Helms, R-N.C. Moynihan said there is currently enough classified material to stack up as high as 441 Washington monuments.

S. 1801 seeks to alleviate the burden created by special search requests. These comprehensive reviews of classified information on topics such as human rights violations in Guatemala and Nazi war crimes are overwhelming the staffs and budgets of security agencies. The President, members of Congress, and agency heads can all request such ad hoc searches-resulting in many redundant requests, according to Rep. Porter J. Goss, R-Fla., chairman of the House Intelligence Committee.

"Members of Congress, executive branch policymakers, and interest groups have asked the intelligence community to conduct and complete no fewer than nine separate searches since 1993 for records on the churchwomen murdered in El Salvador," Goss said.

To reduce the drain on resources, the Clinton administration has occasionally used a system of "bulk declassifications." One bulk declassification at the Energy Department, however, accidentally released 25 documents containing sensitive nuclear weapons-related data.

Dr. Warren Kimball, Robert Treat professor of history at Rutgers University in New Jersey suggested the board should meet two or three times a year and that current government officials should be excluded from membership.

"The board must have the public's confidence that it is independent if it is to confirm the comprehensiveness of declassification programs and legitimate "special searches," said Kimball.

R. James Woolsey, former director of the CIA, stressed the importance of selecting a board members with diverse experience with classified material. He suggested placing historians side by side with former intelligence and military officers. However, he said that funding for the board was crucial to attract people of the highest caliber.

Many agency-review boards already advise government officials on declassification policies, including an Interagency Security Classification Appeals Panel and the State Department's Advisory Committee on Historical Diplomatic Documentation.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Forecasting Cloud's Future

    Conversations with Federal, State, and Local Technology Leaders on Cloud-Driven Digital Transformation

  • The Big Data Campaign Trail

    With everyone so focused on security following recent breaches at federal, state and local government and education institutions, there has been little emphasis on the need for better operations. This report breaks down some of the biggest operational challenges in IT management and provides insight into how agencies and leaders can successfully solve some of the biggest lingering government IT issues.

  • Communicating Innovation in Federal Government

    Federal Government spending on ‘obsolete technology’ continues to increase. Supporting the twin pillars of improved digital service delivery for citizens on the one hand, and the increasingly optimized and flexible working practices for federal employees on the other, are neither easy nor inexpensive tasks. This whitepaper explores how federal agencies can leverage the value of existing agency technology assets while offering IT leaders the ability to implement the kind of employee productivity, citizen service improvements and security demanded by federal oversight.

  • IT Transformation Trends: Flash Storage as a Strategic IT Asset

    MIT Technology Review: Flash Storage As a Strategic IT Asset For the first time in decades, IT leaders now consider all-flash storage as a strategic IT asset. IT has become a new operating model that enables self-service with high performance, density and resiliency. It also offers the self-service agility of the public cloud combined with the security, performance, and cost-effectiveness of a private cloud. Download this MIT Technology Review paper to learn more about how all-flash storage is transforming the data center.

  • Ongoing Efforts in Veterans Health Care Modernization

    This report discusses the current state of veterans health care


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.